Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Dermott on a PTO, Will We See More PTO's? Can We Get Some Toughness Too Please?

Took a pill in Sbisa

2showToffoliIwascool
Apr 23, 2004
16,614
7,592
Australia
What leads you to believe Emberson can be a top 4 defenseman on this team anytime soon? Maybe in 3-5 years he could be something, and that's a long shot. He has 30 games of NHL experience and I don't see glimpses of anything special. Not in the player's reads or physical abilities.

Statistics?





What makes you believe he can't be? Or do you think your eye-test is more telling than statistics. Would love to know which NHL team you scout for if so.
 

Senor Catface

Registered User
Jul 25, 2006
16,532
21,648
if they had caproom they could find someone on waivers.. or make a trade.

drake-computer.gif
 

Broberg Speed

Registered User
Oct 23, 2020
8,085
5,435
Statistics?





What makes you believe he can't be? Or do you think your eye-test is more telling than statistics. Would love to know which NHL team you scout for if so.

I've seen those aberrations. I want Emberson to succeed. I'm sure he'll be tolerable in the top 4 against middling teams who have players who play at his level or a level below. Against top 10 teams, with considerably better players, he likely gets outmatched. Against elite teams, ruined. I hope I'm wrong.

I mentioned today I stopped watching AHL hockey, do you know why? Because it's barely watchable these days. The same can be said for watching some of the less talented NHL teams.

30 games, if you want to prove anything of relevance you would have to do an eye test, while considering the opponent as well as the players he faced off against for each of those 30 games. If you did that and came back with a report that I find credible... you are an expert. I doubt you have the resources to do that.

Here is a hyperlink to Ty Emberson's individual game log breakdown for all 30 2023-24 regular season games.
 

Took a pill in Sbisa

2showToffoliIwascool
Apr 23, 2004
16,614
7,592
Australia
I've seen those aberrations. I want Emberson to succeed. I'm sure he'll be tolerable in the top 4 against middling teams who have players who play at his level or a level below. Against top 10 teams, with considerably better players, he likely gets outmatched. Against elite teams, ruined. I hope I'm wrong.

I mentioned today I stopped watching AHL hockey, do you know why? Because it's barely watchable these days. The same can be said for watching some of the less talented NHL teams.

30 games, if you want to prove anything of relevance you would have to do an eye test, while considering the opponent as well as the players he faced off against for each of those 30 games. If you did that and came back with a report that I find credible... you are an expert. I doubt you have the resources to do that.

Here is a hyperlink to Ty Emberson's individual game log breakdown for all 30 2023-24 regular season games.

You keep making proclamations without any sort of evidence to back your position. It's hard to take your opinions seriously if you can't provide context.
 

McFlyingV

Registered User
Feb 22, 2013
23,738
15,656
Edmonton, Alberta
Statistics?





What makes you believe he can't be? Or do you think your eye-test is more telling than statistics. Would love to know which NHL team you scout for if so.

These statistics don't surprise me at all. You can see the defensive hockey IQ with him every shift. He just recognizes where danger is and positionally puts himself in excellent positions to cut off high danger passes or tie up the high danger option. When you pair that with a good skater who has a quality breakout pass and a decent wingspan you usually have a very good defensive D. Should only get better as he gets more NHL games in and is still a good bet to become a top 4D throughout the season or into next year given he's only 24.

I like this bet by the Oilers, but I also love high hockey sense D who can skate and move the puck, and he checks off all 3 boxes. Time will tell if there's more offence there to give, but he should be able to limit the fire drill scrambles that always made the Nurse-Ceci pairing a disaster simply because he's a better skater, puck retriever, puck mover and reads the play better than Ceci did.
 

Faelko

Registered User
Aug 11, 2002
11,999
5,267
These statistics don't surprise me at all. You can see the defensive hockey IQ with him every shift. He just recognizes where danger is and positionally puts himself in excellent positions to cut off high danger passes or tie up the high danger option. When you pair that with a good skater who has a quality breakout pass and a decent wingspan you usually have a very good defensive D. Should only get better as he gets more NHL games in and is still a good bet to become a top 4D throughout the season or into next year given he's only 24.

I like this bet by the Oilers, but I also love high hockey sense D who can skate and move the puck, and he checks off all 3 boxes. Time will tell if there's more offence there to give, but he should be able to limit the fire drill scrambles that always made the Nurse-Ceci pairing a disaster simply because he's a better skater, puck retriever, puck mover and reads the play better than Ceci did.
It’s just unfortunate that they have to push him into the 2RHD, giving him a year at 3RHD with Kulak would’ve been perfect but is what it is…
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,545
14,564
Somewhere on Uranus
Statistics?





What makes you believe he can't be? Or do you think your eye-test is more telling than statistics. Would love to know which NHL team you scout for if so.



here is an example of why I hate snap shot analytics and people being so confident in them.

Emberson only played in 30 nhl games last year. Some might want to play that down but for me when your talking less the a 1/2 season. The analytics come with an *. That is jut me
 

Took a pill in Sbisa

2showToffoliIwascool
Apr 23, 2004
16,614
7,592
Australia
here is an example of why I hate snap shot analytics and people being so confident in them.

Emberson only played in 30 nhl games last year. Some might want to play that down but for me when your talking less the a 1/2 season. The analytics come with an *. That is jut me

Not saying they are the be-all-end-all, but it's all we have so far. The argument is if he's capable of being a 4D this year. Based on what we have so far, It doesn't appear outside of question.

I'd be much more worried if we had. 30-game snapshot of him failing at defense.
 

Jumptheshark

Rebooting myself
Oct 12, 2003
100,545
14,564
Somewhere on Uranus
Not saying they are the be-all-end-all, but it's all we have so far. The argument is if he's capable of being a 4D this year. Based on what we have so far, It doesn't appear outside of question.

I'd be much more worried if we had. 30-game snapshot of him failing at defense.


No I was talking about the twitter guy who posted the sample size.
I am more interested in the fact Emberson played 69 games for Knob in the AHL. And the the Rangers traded 2 seconds to get him in 2022
 

McAsuno

Registered User
Jul 10, 2013
27,260
37,116
Edmonton
This Escott guy was defending Brown hard a few days ago lol.

It's funny how wrong often the Oilers media members are. Bootlickers who often get all 'pissy' or defensive when they get called out for being wrong. Always starts with the weasel Spector, then Matheson, then Gregor, and the list goes on from there including Escott.
Literally, Josh Brown was analytically one of the worst D man last season alone, and even the charts show that he's such a piss poor dman. But but but the media members say he's big and has grit! I personally don't care how big or how gritty he is when his stickhandling, passing, and defensive IQ is massively mediocre. He's never going to be the next Vinny Desharnais here.

Somebody on twitter basically said any time Brown's on the ice, opponents advanced stats offensively would rival McDavid. Oilers cannot afford to go on another slow start like last season either. Bury him in the AHL and only call him up when it's a game where there's potential facepunching involved.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davo Ikinzom

Broberg Speed

Registered User
Oct 23, 2020
8,085
5,435
These statistics don't surprise me at all. You can see the defensive hockey IQ with him every shift. He just recognizes where danger is and positionally puts himself in excellent positions to cut off high danger passes or tie up the high danger option. When you pair that with a good skater who has a quality breakout pass and a decent wingspan you usually have a very good defensive D. Should only get better as he gets more NHL games in and is still a good bet to become a top 4D throughout the season or into next year given he's only 24.

I like this bet by the Oilers, but I also love high hockey sense D who can skate and move the puck, and he checks off all 3 boxes. Time will tell if there's more offence there to give, but he should be able to limit the fire drill scrambles that always made the Nurse-Ceci pairing a disaster simply because he's a better skater, puck retriever, puck mover and reads the play better than Ceci did.

I saw some pretty questionable shit from Emberson in pre-season and that's a fact. Two occasions from the last pre-season game alone, one in the defensive zone and one in the offensive zone, I was left thinking wtf... that isn't good.
You keep making proclamations without any sort of evidence to back your position. It's hard to take your opinions seriously if you can't provide context.

I hear proclamations claiming this player is a stud because of stats from a small sample of fancies without even a hint of variables included with them. I guess we'll have to wait and see. You seem more assured of your opinion on Emberson than anyone.
 

Took a pill in Sbisa

2showToffoliIwascool
Apr 23, 2004
16,614
7,592
Australia
I saw some pretty questionable shit from Emberson in pre-season and that's a fact. Two occasions from the last pre-season game alone, one in the defensive zone and one in the offensive zone, I was left thinking wtf... that isn't good.


I hear proclamations claiming this player is a stud because of stats from a small sample of fancies without even a hint of variables included with them. I guess we'll have to wait and see. You seem more assured of your opinion on Emberson than anyone.

That's interesting, I'm more impressed than anything that you know my opinion before I even do. I haven't formed one yet let alone presented one on these boards.

I'm encouraged by what he's done in his limited ice time though.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad