Pointteen
Registered User
Weber is a dman every team makes room for. Seabrook is a dman most teams make room for.
Weber's down year this year was a Seabrook year.
Weber's down year this year was a Seabrook year.
Watched the Canada-Russia junior showcase tonight.
Have to say, Marner looks like he could be the third best player from the draft. He was quite easily better than Strome. Looks basically like Patrick Kane. If we had drafted him we would be drooling over his performance tonight.
Then again, Sam Gagner once looked very good in a Super Series.
Weber is a dman every team makes room for. Seabrook is a dman most teams make room for.
Weber's down year this year was a Seabrook year.
You're kind of agreeing with my point aren't you?
If Nashville demands the type of package that lots are suggesting they would, they aren't going to get a deal for Weber. So they wont deal him. Unless they are in a position where they felt they needed to deal him. In which case they'd have to take less.
btw, what's the word on Gagner? Did Philly buy him out and he became UFA?
Watched the Canada-Russia junior showcase tonight.
Have to say, Marner looks like he could be the third best player from the draft. He was quite easily better than Strome. Looks basically like Patrick Kane. If we had drafted him we would be drooling over his performance tonight.
Then again, Sam Gagner once looked very good in a Super Series.
Man I remember how excited everyone was after that tournament. Gagner was far and away the best player on a team that had Giroux, Turris and Tavares. Just absolutely destroyed it. And then followed it up with a great rookie year. Too bad it all went sideways and he never got any better after that
I still actually think the best hockey he played, by a lot, was the end of 08-09 and not the more famous rookie run. While the rest of the team was busy choking away a playoff spot, he scored 10-11-21 in 20GP with a +4 rating down that stretch. There were no huge blowout loses or ridiculously improbable three straight OT winners from his winger involved, just big performances in the last important games the Oilers have played.
The Oilers failed him. He should be better than he is, and I think that's more on Kevin Lowe, Craig MacTavish and co. than Sam Gagner himself.
You cannot blame Lowe nor MacTavish..........that's pure bull........!!! It's up to the individual player...........remember Gagner is now on his third or fourth team and you are not blaming the other team's coaches and GM?..........just Lowe and MacT?
Did his last 3 team have a hand in developing him ? No they got what Lowe and MacT made him . Mac T to a lessor extent , more Tamblowe
I suspect Seabrook will move and Weber will not. But even if that weren't true, you also have to factor in cost. Are the Oilers a better team with RNH+Seabrook than they are without RNH and with Weber? I'm not so sure.
It's something you gotta look at, for sure.
Weber is Seabrook with a lot more offense.
I still actually think the best hockey he played, by a lot, was the end of 08-09 and not the more famous rookie run. While the rest of the team was busy choking away a playoff spot, he scored 10-11-21 in 20GP with a +4 rating down that stretch. There were no huge blowout loses or ridiculously improbable three straight OT winners from his winger involved, just big performances in the last important games the Oilers have played.
The Oilers failed him. He should be better than he is, and I think that's more on Kevin Lowe, Craig MacTavish and co. than Sam Gagner himself.
Watched the Canada-Russia junior showcase tonight.
Have to say, Marner looks like he could be the third best player from the draft. He was quite easily better than Strome. Looks basically like Patrick Kane. If we had drafted him we would be drooling over his performance tonight.
Then again, Sam Gagner once looked very good in a Super Series.
I went camping with no cell phone all weekend and dont wanna go back through all these pages to find out
Is there legit rumors about Weber? or just people having fun with it?
And meaner, and better defensively. Weber is a better player all around.
NSH trading Weber makes less and less sense as time goes on.
1) The return probably gets significantly worse each year they hang onto him
2) Being a budget conscious team, almost done paying the $14 and $12m years, he becomes somewhat of a bargain in 3 years - and Nashville is exactly the kind of team that won't mind a higher cap hit lower salary player.
He's the face of that franchise - the only reason they would trade him is money, and they've almost paid out the bulk of it already. Might as well hang on to him now.