Barnaby
Registered User
Oh, stop.I wouldnt assume that..
Especially with drury.
And again, its a third rounder.. at this point its a total crapshoot. Why waste an asset.
Oh, stop.I wouldnt assume that..
Especially with drury.
And again, its a third rounder.. at this point its a total crapshoot. Why waste an asset.
Agreed. Dude says a third is a total crapshoot without much value, but a 7th is a asset that shouldn’t be wasted.Oh, stop.
This logic sucks.Muse knew the kids name before today, so he already knows more than we do.
A late 3rd is a long shot anyway. I have no problem at all taking a defenseman whom the Rangers should be knowledgeable about, who is going to a very strong NCAA hockey program.
Let him simmer for 4 years and at the end we might have a player, or we might not.
He wasted an asset to move up one spot. Is absolutely dimb.Oh, stop.
He wasted an asset to move up one spot. Is absolutely dimb.
Other teams traded future pick of same round to move up which is a smart move as no assets are wasted. But no our genius of a gm felt the need to throw away a pick, one that probably wont make the nhl, but a 1% chance is better than nothing. Or that 7th could be getting a player at trade deadline.
Even if he knew pitt was going to take him… was he really that much better than what is still available? Especially since its the third round where the odds are against you.
Its just bad asset management. But drury has shown many times he likes to overpay or get poor returns on assets he is trading.
You seem to be saying a using a future 3rd round pick to move up is smarter than trading a 7th in the same draft which makes zero sense to me. So maybe that isn’t what you meant?He wasted an asset to move up one spot. Is absolutely dimb.
Other teams traded future pick of same round to move up which is a smart move as no assets are wasted. But no our genius of a gm felt the need to throw away a pick, one that probably wont make the nhl, but a 1% chance is better than nothing. Or that 7th could be getting a player at trade deadline.
Even if he knew pitt was going to take him… was he really that much better than what is still available? Especially since its the third round where the odds are against you.
Its just bad asset management. But drury has shown many times he likes to overpay or get poor returns on assets he is trading.
I took “of same round” to mean a future 3rd. Which is bizarre so you are probably right… though it is still a ridiculously nitpicky thing to go on about IMO.Are you taking the piss, or was that mean to be serious?
And if you were serious, how is moving a 2023 7th a wasted asset, but moving a 2024 7th not?
I think people are saying it’s a possibility he will be that type player if he makes it, not an expectation that he does.Lol at guys expecting another Lindgren.
Odds are this guy will never sniff an NHL game.
Late 3rd round guys rarely make it.
I took him to mean a future 7th (like we used), but regradless of round any daft pick is an asset so I really can't understand how using one is a waste but using another isn't (athough it is Friday arvo and I have been drinking...). Weird stuffI took “of same round” to mean a future 3rd. Which is bizarre so you are probably right… though it is still a ridiculously nitpicky thing to go on about IMO.
I think people are saying it’s a possibility he will be that type player if he makes it, not an expectation that he does.
Why would Pitt do that tho without a sweetener… like a 6th or 7th?No i meant trading next uears 3rd for the pitt 3rd. And we kept our same third this year and have back to back picks.
There were a couple trades like that this year where one team traded their future pick of the same round for the current pick of the same round.
That is being smart.
Trading an extra pick to move up 1 spot in the third round is dumb.
What are you even talking about? He was projected to go right where he was picked and he is not a bad skater.classic pick- another bad skater who can’t do much! My god what is wrong with this organization…
How do you know? Were you sitting at the table with Drury and co.? Obviously they weren't just going to give up a 7th rounder for no reason at all.To put it another way. If the rangers “knew” that Pitt was taking Fortescue then Pitt valued the extra 7th over him.
but again Drury is really bad at valuing draft picks.
We have seen it in the Buch trade, the overpayment to get rid of Nemeth. He has not maximized any deal yet.
Its not like a 7th rounder is a big deal. But there was absolutely no need to do this.
Literally the second bullet point in his rundown from some scouting services is “mediocre skater.”What are you even talking about? He was projected to go right where he was picked and he is not a bad skater.
NHL Draft Countdown; No. 17: Drew Fortescue, D, NTDP
Counting down 25 of the top NTDP and USHL draft-eligible prospects that should hear their name called later this month in Nashvillewww.therinklive.com
He’s a bigger defensemen,” added an NHL scout. “Even though he’s not necessarily a guy that’s gonna run you over, he’s physical and he has some real toughness to him. He’s not a super offensive guy but he moves pucks well, he starts plays in his own zone and he can skate. He defends well, he’s got the reach and he’s got a lot of the things that you want out of a defenseman.”Literally the second bullet point in his rundown from some scouting services is “mediocre skater.”
Pearl River? Cool my neck of the woods.
Me too.
Yup.