Daz28
Registered User
- Nov 1, 2010
- 12,761
- 2,217
People losing their minds over Stillman or Bryson?
People losing their minds over Stillman or Bryson?
Its not about losing their minds. I just want to turn the page and sick of seeing him out there. He adds nothing.People losing their minds over Stillman or Bryson?
I don't see how his particular brand of 'it' is a team need.Bryson knows he needs to bring it. There is enough depth behind him ready to take his spot.
Stillman on waivers is a bad look for Adams.
That’s why he’s the no 7 defenseman - you won’t see him out there unless there’s an injury.if he adds nothing but also subtracts little - then he’s doing his job as a depth d. Novikov and for sure Johnson will probably be in that role by the end of the year…he’s filler bc that’s exactly what he is - filler.Its not about losing their minds. I just want to turn the page and sick of seeing him out there. He adds nothing.
Stillman on waivers is a bad look for Adams.
Who cares? Think of it as a third for depth D at the deadline. We have McCarthy drafted with that 3rd this year instead of bloom. And I’d rather have the defenseman we drafted this year with our third then bloom.The only way it matters is if Stillman gets claimed, that would mean we traded Bloom for essentially nothing.
It also shows Pegula has given him leeway to run his team.
Make sure you warm up before that stretch.
Sorry, folks. I defended the trade and can still be convinced it was the best move over Bryson, but its worth discussion. Not sure why you are so quick to shut that down.
I'm convinced my sentence was meant to continue the discussion.Sorry, folks. I defended the trade and can still be convinced it was the best move over Bryson, but its worth discussion. Not sure why you are so quick to shut that down.
I think Stillman is more valuable than Bryson as well.I was a big Bryson fan 2 years ago great skater moved the puck good positional defenceman. Then last year happened and he did a 180 not sure why.However at end of day we are talking a debt defenceman who is good in locker room which means alot as a debt guy.Short term injury Bryson will play, longterm Johnson or whomever is playing well in Rochester. It's a debt guy in a month Stillman could be up and Bryson down it doesn't effect our top 5The accountable part?
I don’t understand how Stillman cost us Bloom and not 7th round, guys like that end up on waivers, which is what happened. This all looks damn weird.
Stillman was traded for a 2nd and a 4th liner a couple months before we traded a marginal prospect for him...I don’t understand how Stillman cost us Bloom and not 7th round, guys like that end up on waivers, which is what happened. This all looks damn weird.
He is still on the team though and he shouldn't be.That’s why he’s the no 7 defenseman - you won’t see him out there unless there’s an injury.if he adds nothing but also subtracts little - then he’s doing his job as a depth d. Novikov and for sure Johnson will probably be in that role by the end of the year…he’s filler bc that’s exactly what he is - filler.
What you've been told several times about this specific situation (Bryson/Stillman #7+8 dmen) is that your cap argument makes no sense.