Throttle
Registered User
- Sep 22, 2020
- 5,446
- 5,184
Maybe when they sign Tavares they will…No one waives to go to Buffalo.
Maybe when they sign Tavares they will…No one waives to go to Buffalo.
True -No one waives to go to Buffalo.
Each of them taken individually are not bad players (and I love Romanov and still like Pulock), but you can't have Romanov, Pelech, Pulock and Mayfield as 4 of your 6 D in today's NHL. Especially with a forward group that's not elite. Something's gotta give. Roy and Mayfield don't mix and that seems to be the no-brainer, but do you also move Pulock or Pelech?It's also a key reason why Darche being able to move any of Pulock, Pelech, or Mayfield out in a deal that allows him to angle in a more PMD style player would immediately have him in my very good fan graces.
I think you need to move 2 of Pelech, Pulock and Mayfield. First Bridge call up is likely George and he isn’t much of a puck mover.Each of them taken individually are not bad players (and I love Romanov and still like Pulock), but you can't have Romanov, Pelech, Pulock and Mayfield as 4 of your 6 D in today's NHL. Especially with a forward group that's not elite. Something's gotta give. Roy and Mayfield don't mix and that seems to be the no-brainer, but do you also move Pulock or Pelech?
He was just responding to the posts a few days ago about it, relax.Why does this matter?
Move on - Lou is no longer GM.
Maybe not 100% because who knows what the new GM will want to do, but given that our only other options on the left side right now that are under contract are Pelech and George I would be shocked if Romanov wasn’t locked up. Just don’t see a point in us moving him when he fits in as the team is now and also is young enough where he’ll fit in when we’re ready to be competitive.What do you guys think of Romanov?
100% being re-signed?
Hear me out.Maybe not 100% because who knows what the new GM will want to do, but given that our only other options on the left side right now that are under contract are Pelech and George I would be shocked if Romanov wasn’t locked up. Just don’t see a point in us moving him when he fits in as the team is now and also is young enough where he’ll fit in when we’re ready to be competitive.
I see Turcotte as a player in UFA trade deadline transaction vs a regular transaction. The circumstances of the trade change it’s dynamic.Hear me out.
Jordan Spence + Alex Turcotte![]()
No Thanks.Hear me out.
Jordan Spence + Alex Turcotte![]()
What do you guys think of Romanov?
100% being re-signed?
Each of them taken individually are not bad players (and I love Romanov and still like Pulock), but you can't have Romanov, Pelech, Pulock and Mayfield as 4 of your 6 D in today's NHL. Especially with a forward group that's not elite. Something's gotta give. Roy and Mayfield don't mix and that seems to be the no-brainer, but do you also move Pulock or Pelech?
Really the only trade of a first round pick that was worth it. Getting a young, good D Man with Romanov's qualities at 22 with 100 plus games experience actually helped the club for the long haul, which is what #1 round picks are for.Have a hard time seeing the Isles want to part with Romanov.
He's been developing exactly as we could have wished for and brings some things to the tabel that don't grow on trees.
And he has an infectious attitude. Very easy to root for. An ideal 2nd pairing Dman.
Yes. He's a keeper.What do you guys think of Romanov?
100% being re-signed?
More desirable locations I’d think.True -
How about Columbus?
Would Columbus go for Pulock for Voronkov?
Have a hard time seeing the Isles want to part with Romanov.
He's been developing exactly as we could have wished for and brings some things to the tabel that don't grow on trees.
And he has an infectious attitude. Very easy to root for. An ideal 2nd pairing Dman.
Sure, he should get some money now but he's at an affordable phase.
We naturally don't know how the new manager will go about things here but if they move on from Romanov for whatever reason, they're going to have a number of interested parties to choose from.
I'd hate to lose his physical play.
for Romanov? I'd say switch Turcotte with someone else.Hear me out.
Jordan Spence + Alex Turcotte![]()
Ah, sweet summer child.when we’re ready to be competitive.
All fair points. All good points.
And I guess it speaks to where this team is...Which is nowhere near a Cup WITH Romanov (and all his positive attributes).
The roster really is a mess with not many players that would bring back a good amount in a trade...Or can be traded at all.
Something has got to give and there really should be no untouchables on this roster. Besides if anyone is willing to trade Dobson's upside, then there should be zero objections to trading Romanov - IF the return is legit.
Ekholm trade is more than adequate for a Pulock comparison.Oh yes, that's true. And they're all on the table.
Personally, putting all thoughts on the on-ice dynamics aside, and due to the contracts Pulock, Pelech, and Mayfield have been given, signing Romanov and Dobson right now to longer contracts at something comparable to market value is a "No-can-do".
We'd immediately be in a contractual blueline quagmire that, if and when things go south, you can only pay your way out of. Probably even dearly.
And Darche isn't coming in here to plug himself in a hole like that. That can't be what the owners have dismissed Lou for.
Darche has to find a way to efficiently create some space to breath on this blueline.
Islander fans should be ready for the possibility that Darche's only option to take a different route for the short- and long-term better is to move guys now who have the trade value.
We may not want them to go but if you can't work miracles with the players your predecessor entrenched you with contractually, then the business plan needs other outlets.
***
This said, I do think there are ways to move Pulock, Pelech, and/or Mayfield as described above. Eat some salary and don't demand the world, you might find something.
I remember being surprised by the readiness of Edmonton fans to the suggestion of taking Pelech AND Mayfield in return for Nurse and a sweetener. They even felt the change of scenary would probably do wonders for Nurse. You don't really save money on that but you do free up a spot on the blueline while maybe getting a guy who can simply help you more.
Ekholm trade is more than adequate for a Pulock comparison.
If you are in win now mode, kinda like EDM is/was, then you focus only on the term in that window. The remainder of the term you deal with later on. If you are trying to take the next step like a SJ, then it provides continuity.That's good. Moneywise, right on the dot.
When Edmonton acquired Ekholm, he had three more years on his contract.
Pulock's first expires in 2030.
Would that see him devalued in a trade?
There are surely some takers out there, especially with the cap going up.
It's doable.