Roster/Rumors/Speculation/Trade Talk - 2024-25: Re-Tool, Re-Group, Re-Mix, Re-Build

[doublechili]

Today’s bullshit rumor - we trade Dobson within the division to a team with no need for an RHD

I don't know that I'd trust the Hockeyy Insiderr report as it's since been refuted by a report from Hockeyyyy Insiderrrr.

I always go with the rumor site with more consonants.

 

[Big L]

I don't know that I'd trust the Hockeyy Insiderr report as it's since been refuted by a report from Hockeyyyy Insiderrrr.

I always go with the rumor site with more consonants.

More consonants equals more correct.

 

[periferal]

Today’s bullshit rumor - we trade Dobson within the division to a team with no need for an RHD

Since this non-insider actually tagged the two teams would be beyond awesome if one or both replied and said something like, "Not only are we not talking trade, but we don't even like them."

 

[Arsenalogist24]

I know an Island for you Elias

 

[YearlyLottery]

Well I asked because I addressed this very thing you're saying yesterday. So either you didn't fully read my post on this...Or you don't want to fully digest it. For whatever reason you don't want to see the reality of the situation which is...The "new" lottery rules don't change anything - Getting top picks and hitting on them is still the most effective way to become a perennial Cup contender.

You want to just throw out everything that the Kings, Blackhawks, Penguins, Avalanche, Lightning, and Panthers have accomplished with tons of top 10 picks on all of their Cup winning rosters? Got news for you...Of that last 16 Cup winners those teams won 12 of them. That means 75% of the last 16 Cup winners had their core (most important players) being acquired by not trades or free agency...But top draft picks.

If you truly think that's going to change now that you can move up 10 spots in the lottery as opposed to 4, then you either don't know franchise building...Or are just denying that drafting top 5 works because you don't want to see the Islanders go down that road.

The reality is that in today's NHL more elite players/all-stars/hall of famers spend their prime years with the team that drafted them than are traded...So assuming you're going to build a Cup winning team with trades or free agency is literally going against what the data says.

If you want to stick your head in the sand and continue on with Lou and his "trade 1st rounders for average talent, then resign those players to bloated/lengthy deals that lead to a fringe playoff team at best" be my guest, but don't sit there and try to manipulate actual proven data to justify your opinion. At least have the balls to admit you don't want the Isles to lose to get top draft picks and build a team that way for whatever reason.

Your paragraphs here are meaningless. Period. LA, CHI, PITT, COL, TB all built on the promise of getting multiple top 2 picks. This is not a given any longer. Also, LA was built through some great trades as well such as Carter and Gaborik. I mean how the hell are you seriously going to sit here and say FLORIDA was not built on the Tkatchuk trade. That core SUCKED and had less playoff success than the Barzal, Sorokin, Dobson core that you seemingly despise.

Cute that you continue to feel as if I am defending trading first round picks, not dealing guys like Nelson, etc.

This will be the last time I respond to these posts from you until you can give me one example of a team going through a multi year rebuild in the current draft era.

 

[LeapOnOver]

I get the sense that you’re in the contingent that on some level takes offense at anyone that has a critical eye towards our GM or any of the veteran players.

Don’t get me wrong. I think Brock Nelson is a talented player, but it’s quite likely that we’ve seen the best of his play and he’ll be a depreciating asset going forward. Are we a better team this year and next year without him? Probably so but frankly I don’t think we are in a Cup contending position to benefit from having him on the squad in the near term. If we let the other scenario play out, we get valuable assets in a trade for him, get younger and don’t have to deal with a high veteran AAV deal that we might regret in 2 to 4 years.

Long story short. IMO he needs to be dealt before the trade deadline. That’s especially important for a team that is light on younger NHL players, prospects and draft capital.

Well, not everyone has keen senses. I'm the one who started a thread just before last season suggesting Brock Nelson could be an option to move at the trade deadline for an excellent haul if the team is not in a playoff spot. I'm still not opposed to trading him. I'm not sure where the jump from his performance at Four Nations leads to their being some offense taken or wanting Brock Nelson to be forever an Islander. You know they are not connected, correct?

His play simply matched my expectations during Four Nations, that's it. I noticed many people criticizing his performance and was just a bit baffled on why their expectations where high. I'm in the boat where if Brock Nelson doesn't want to sign a team friendly deal that puts him in the area where he can age into a 3C or even a wing, I'm not opposed to keeping him. If he wants to be paid as a 2c and long term, yes, definitely trade him.

Not sure it is the player people like or that we’ve watched these other guys for years and it isn’t working. He can at least move the puck up the ice and give us a chance at some offense.

Two years in a row these guys have gone down and replacements from the garbage heap have been better. Last thing I want to watch is Pulock and his cement skates..

Better? Hardly. Bad in a different area; correct.

 

[impaaaaaact]

Martin to "IR", Barzal to LTIR. Dobson probably plays tomorrow