Chapin Landvogt
Registered User
This may be premature, but I wanted to post it.
This will be my last large hockey blog post for awhile.
Who ya kiddin'?
This may be premature, but I wanted to post it.
This will be my last large hockey blog post for awhile.
5'11", 170. Just turned 18 2 months ago. Plenty of time to fill out. Basically Ehlers' current size.Ooof next 15 looks brutal. Looks like 4 wins, max out of that.
Not fer nuthin, Hagens is not a big fella. Looked rather small next to teammates at the WJCs
Yep, getting Hagens would be cool.
You are correct - Potvin went #1 overall.Thanks brother. Interesting time. Hey was #5 a first overall back in the day? Too lazy to look up
Would be nice to grease bettman and co to win the lottery this year. Was kinda easy for the rags to move up big time getting awarded 1 and 2 back to back years.
Getting any young talent that we can safely say will have a long term NHL career would be exciting at this point. A blue chip talent would be over the top.
I mean it's been so unbearably dry in our prospect system part of me thinks that Danny Nelson will be the next (Carolina) Sebastian Aho when we would be very fortunate if he was even close to the next Brock Nelson.
So would me getting a date with Scarlett Johansson.Yep, getting Hagens would be cool.
So would me getting a date with Scarlett Johansson.
Perif my friend, you need a 28-day vacation with no internet connection! Maybe a Clipper Ship in the Pacific, visiting Vanuato, Fiji and a few more. A few tropical drinks, a daily massage, a couple of 25-year old's named Kim, fresh fish and fruits.
Then when you come back, Lou has completely overturned the roster, and you missed a 10-game winning streak . . .
Imagine how much better you'd feel!
I don't even understand your logic - If I 10 game winning streak would make me feel "better," then why would I want to miss that?
Also, didn't Billy Harris go #1 in the team's first season?You are correct - Potvin went #1 overall.
Also, didn't Billy Harris go #1 in the team's first season?
Tons of games for the bottom dwellers in the Eastern Conference tonight. That includes some head-to-head matchups
that could result in three-point games.
It’s gotten to the point where I hope as many of those teams as possible get two points. That means all of them. Except the Rags, of course. They can suck a whole bag of d*cks. (Chris Rock’s best line).
If Lou’s mind were a campfire, I want to extinguish his most remote thought that we are contenders.
I am occasionally wrong but never in doubt.You mean Louis CK.
You had me convinced, even though I knew better. I even imagined Rock doing that bit...I am occasionally wrong but never in doubt.
So it makes perfect sense to bring up scenarios that rarely, if ever happen, like they are commonplace? I think it would have been better in this case to say, "You are right, but if the Isles could have done a sign and trade, that's what I would have wanted to happen. Rolling the dice would not have been a smart option."A bit different scenario, but Matthew Tkachuk deal was 100% sign and trade. So, there’s precedent for it.
The argument before that was ‘it’s never happened before so…’ until two GMs do it.
No one ever gave bonuses as ‘salary’ under the hard cap, well, until they did and now it happens quite frequently.
No one ever put an ‘injured’ player on LTIR for the benefit of the cap bc you can’t really do that until someone did and again, it happens quite frequently.
No one ever gave out deferred salary until, well, someone did.
No one ever put a guy on waivers to avoid trade protection until someone did.
Just got to tune him out.So it makes perfect sense to bring up scenarios that rarely, if ever happen, like they are commonplace? I think it would have been better in this case to say, "You are right, but if the Isles could have done a sign and trade, that's what I would have wanted to happen. Rolling the dice would not have been a smart option."
Yeah, I mean I'm willing to let a guy have his opinion on players, but have to draw the line when he wants to dangle one for a roll of the dice and double down on it when that's pointed out. In the grand scheme of things, Horvat and Barzal have not been healthy at the same time very much at all since he was acquired.Just got to tune him out.
Of course, the Tkachuk trade was a sign and trade - he was an RFA and picked the destination he was going to be traded to and wanted to sign there. Not the same thing when it comes to Horvat.
And what doesn't make sense in this revisionist history is the Isles had just extended Barzal. He may not like Barzal, but the Isles leadership does.
The entire concept of a trade of Horvat for Barzal makes zero sense - why make the trade? Just keep the guy you just signed. Horvat doesn't make the team better without Barzal.
Getting any young talent that we can safely say will have a long term NHL career would be exciting at this point. A blue chip talent would be over the top.
I mean it's been so unbearably dry in our prospect system part of me thinks that Danny Nelson will be the next (Carolina) Sebastian Aho when we would be very fortunate if he was even close to the next Brock Nelson.