Roster/Rumors/Speculation/Trade Talk - 2024-25: Re-Tool, Re-Group, Re-Mix, Re-Build

SI

Registered User
Feb 16, 2013
7,884
4,088
It would be absolutely glorious if he gets claimed - eyes are on the Bluejackets.

If he clears and is not traded by the end of the season, then he is most likely a buyout candidate next year with 5 years left @ 3 AAV - the buyout penalty would be 1m per year for 10 years.

Trade possibility A? I wonder if a trade for a player on a long term contract, who is destined to be on LTIR for the remainder of the term, i.e., Ryan Ellis, Carey Price.

Trade possibility B? A player on a similar deal? I don't see any comparables unless it is someone like Miles Wood.

Trade possibility C? A player who makes a ton of $ and Engvall's contract helps to offset the cost, i.e. Nurse or Huberdeau.

Trade possibility D? Isles attach a 1st round pick + to unload the contract.

I think Lou holds the title of GM but I truly believe ROY is quietly in charge.
No way anyone else would have been able to send Engvall down after GM made a huge commitment of Contract to him
Good Call on the Cholowski making the team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Top Corner

JTToilinginToronto

Isles Fan
Jan 18, 2019
4,940
5,130
It would be absolutely glorious if he gets claimed - eyes are on the Bluejackets.

If he clears and is not traded by the end of the season, then he is most likely a buyout candidate next year with 5 years left @ 3 AAV - the buyout penalty would be 1m per year for 10 years.

Trade possibility A? I wonder if a trade for a player on a long term contract, who is destined to be on LTIR for the remainder of the term, i.e., Ryan Ellis, Carey Price.

Trade possibility B? A player on a similar deal? I don't see any comparables unless it is someone like Miles Wood.

Trade possibility C? A player who makes a ton of $ and Engvall's contract helps to offset the cost, i.e. Nurse or Huberdeau.

Trade possibility D? Isles attach a 1st round pick + to unload the contract.


Good Call on the Cholowski making the team.
Just retain 50% and I'm sure someone would bite. $1.5M is nothing in today's cap world.
 

periferal

Registered User
Jul 5, 2007
29,107
16,482
That’s fine. He didn’t EARN his spot for Lou to move on from someone else.

Lou can also force the issue. The player and team can agree to a mutual termination lf Engvall doesn’t want to play in CT for awhile.

Why in the world would Envgall agree to terminate a contract that will pay him $3,000,000/year for the next 4 years wherever he plays....When if he terminated it and became a free agent he would get league minimum to play somewhere else?

I think Lou holds the title of GM but I truly believe ROY is quietly in charge.
No way anyone else would have been able to send Engvall down after GM made a huge commitment of Contract to him

I see how one could have this thought, but the simple answer might just be that Lou backed the team into a corner with the cap and is sending Engvall down, not because he's admitting Engvall sucks, but to be cap compliant.
 

seafoam

Soft Shock
Sponsor
May 17, 2011
60,916
10,381
I’d rather attach a non 1st round pick to Engvall to move the contract in entirety. Chicago would probably listen…
 

Big L

Grandpa’s Cough Medicine is 180 Proof
Feb 7, 2013
12,275
6,656
CT
Exactly like the last preseason game other than Palms is in for Engvall, Mayfield is probably in for Hutton and ? in goal.
Something like this?

Barzal-Horvat-Duclair
Tsyplakov-Nelson-Palmieri
Holmstron-Pageau-Lee
Maclean-Cizikas-Wahlstrom
 

doublechili

For all intensive purposes, your nuts
Apr 11, 2006
18,954
15,403
Lou can also force the issue. The player and team can agree to a mutual termination lf Engvall doesn’t want to play in CT for awhile.
Yeah, Lou can just let time perhaps solve the problem. After a year in BP, if it looks like he could see a repetition next year Engvall could opt to do a Kuimon and go back to Europe. He'll have career earnings over $15M at that point and might not relish the idea of riding the buses for another year or three.

In the meantime, if Engvall was on the roster the cap hit would be $3 million this year. Instead, now Engvall's cap hit is $1.85M and Gauthier's $787,500. So if Engvall's not in the top 9, it's a lower cap hit to send him to the minors and replace him in the NHL with a cheap player.
 

LeapOnOver

Mackenzie is a hack!
Jan 23, 2011
12,591
3,767
Iksan, S. Korea
www.leaponover.com
Really impressed Lou showed us that he doesn't keep with sunk cost fallacy by forcing Engvall into the lineup. I also was incorrect in my assessment and take full responsibility for it. Shocked in a good way!

I do find it odd that we kept Wahsltrom vs. Foudy, but kept Cholowski vs. Bolduc. I'm not necessarily surprised based on performance, but just seems that one decision was based on performance while the other was not.
 

Top Corner

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
2,680
641
Mtl
Visit site
Why in the world would Envgall agree to terminate a contract that will pay him $3,000,000/year for the next 4 years wherever he plays....When if he terminated it and became a free agent he would get league minimum to play somewhere else?



I see how one could have this thought, but the simple answer might just be that Lou backed the team into a corner with the cap and is sending Engvall down, not because he's admitting Engvall sucks, but to be cap compliant.
Certainly that was a huge part , but I think back to Roy leaking the Sorokin injury and believe he’s playing a bigger part just fell of script while Lou was still around.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad