Roster Building XXIV: Our Hearts Go Pitter Pattersson

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
CanesBorg: "Sure, we will help you by taking Miller off your hands. But we might want you to through in a sweetener. How attached to Hughes are you?"
I can see them asking for Hoglander, though.

It means what I suspected: Tulsky sees an anchor of a contract down the line. Is it better to wait until the off-season when a lot of cap is available and get a player who isn't signed to a large cap hit through age 37?

Probably.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
We still don't necessarily know what kind of relationships the current front office setup has with all the insiders. While all info out there has an agenda attached to it, that becomes even more the case if they only get info in our interest from the other parties involved.
 
I can see them asking for Hoglander, though.

I was thinking the same. and his hit is only 1.1 million this year!

then i realized next year starts a 3 x 3 contract, which as recently as last season i would have thought was decent, but he is sitting at 9 points through 43 games this year. i don't know what's happened this year, but oof. maybe he is one of our beloved reclamation projects, but i think it would have to be in the offseason or at least separate from miller.
 
We still don't necessarily know what kind of relationships the current front office setup has with all the insiders. While all info out there has an agenda attached to it, that becomes even more the case if they only get info in our interest from the other parties involved.
Lebrun seems to be the most connected with someone in that organization
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG
I can see them asking for Hoglander, though.

It means what I suspected: Tulsky sees an anchor of a contract down the line. Is it better to wait until the off-season when a lot of cap is available and get a player who isn't signed to a large cap hit through age 37?

Probably.

I was thinking the same. and his hit is only 1.1 million this year!

then i realized next year starts a 3 x 3 contract, which as recently as last season i would have thought was decent, but he is sitting at 9 points through 43 games this year. i don't know what's happened this year, but oof. maybe he is one of our beloved reclamation projects, but i think it would have to be in the offseason or at least separate from miller.
I never understood the interest or obsession with Hoglander... he's always kinda seemed like a skilled complimentary player who brings little else if he's not scoring
 
If you wanna hear what Rod thinks of Miller go back and listen to his pre game comments before they played Vancouver. This is what he said:

There are a handful of unique players in the league who can really influence a game by themselves" said Brind'Amour before game against Vancouver Jan. 10. "I would put Miller in that category too. If you watch the way they play, he's their lead dog and does everything for them

Can bet Rod is pushing for this deal to happen
 
Vancouver just had the look of a team who has quit but the individual players would all bounce back elsewhere. So many good pieces that just need a divorce to be happy again.
Be careful what you wish for, Canucks…

kentucky-fried-movie-take-him-to-detroit.gif
 
The heat and noise will only grow with every loss for the Canucks I just can’t see them dragging this out until the deadline. Washington on Saturday could be a third straight loss. If Carolina and multiple offers out you’d think one would be of interest and could be worked out
 
With the Canes starting to play well again, the Canes don't have to rush to make a trade. I'm pretty sure, however, that they will eventually. If Kotkaniemi keeps producing and the price for Miller is too high, the Canes can potentially pivot to a smaller add such as Granlund. We will see what happens, of course.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad