I'm not patronizing. I'm very literal.
In the past couple of years, you've started more aggressively asserting that you very much are the smartest person in the room.
Your creativity is duly noted. There's zero proof of how effective that would have been in the long run. But it's still fun conversation without that air of superiority.
We all have a right to contribute. Obviously.
Please drop the Boo Nieves conversation. I'm being nicer than most people here when I say that it comes off as, "See? Even when I'm wrong, I'm right. And if you think I was wrong, you're double wrong."
Be more fun again.
I can be more fun when you can be more honest
"In the past couple of years, you've started more aggressively asserting that you very much are the smartest person in the room."
== this is an extrapolation by you NOT something I actually said/asserted
"There's zero proof of how effective that would have been in the long run"
Setting aside fun hypotheticals of how effective one of my suggestions would or would not have been, I can claim victory on the grounds that R mgmt decisions WERE IN FACT ACTUAL FAILURE
but setting that aside, peeps forget I was for trading Buch at max value while he had term, not doing what they did and self renting until due to min term his value w/rfa was a sliver of what max return could have been
-- many variations on a theme but we could have had Broberg
"Please drop the Boo Nieves conversation. I'm being nicer than most people here when I say that it comes off as, "See?
Even when I'm wrong, I'm right. And if you think I was wrong, you're double wrong."
Your attempt at word salad to confuse things will not prevail
Peeps are right or wrong on the merits
only ? is to what extent that can be measured ie subjective compared to objective
There is no ?, and there can never be any ?, that yes, bern's experiment MIGHT have failed, BUT THAT LOSES IN DEFEAT to Rs failure to experiment did not work, so was ACTUAL failure
again just be honest
don't make me go Billy Joel on yr ass