UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
K. Miller for Peterka would be a nice move if Buffalo didn't have 50 left defensemen
And he will decline and tell us he wants free agency. Jack already has a multi-year extension. NJD are NOT trading Jack. Your counter argument is "No, Rutherford is making that up" ???
Ridiculous speculation.people are speculating q hughes for laf/schneider in this context
Laf + Schneider for Peterka + Buffalo 2ndK. Miller for Peterka would be a nice move if Buffalo didn't have 50 left defensemen
Ridiculous speculation.
Bring him to the East Coast and then watch him sign across the river? No team is keeping two small d men that each run a pp so IF you were trading for Hughes you are simultaneously saying you are trading fox in that deal or in a second deal after Hughes comes here. Any argument to keep both is nonsense bc they serve the same role on a team. It's all nonsense bc the Canucks have been pretty universally criticized for getting cleaned out on the Miller trade, why would they go back to nyr on a Hughes trade?
they'd be nuts to trade Lafreniere now, his value is as low as possible right now. this place loves to sell low and buy high.
Comparing structure of teams in 2025 to that I'm 1994-95 is not really wise. Not going to argue this, just not worth itis hughes ld or rd?
trading zubov who formed a 2 headed monster on the pp was right up there with chi trading hasek as the pinnacle of 90's bone headed maneuvers.
Do you think Rutherford would put that out there for no reason? He said publicly what basically everyone has speculated about and I think it's pretty obvious that it's to prepare the market for the fact he's going to leave. It doesn't help that his favorite coach just walked away as wellHe didnt state that. Rutherford did. Very different. Quinn will sign in NY if the Rangers offer him what he wants.
Do you think Rutherford would put that out there for no reason? He said publicly what basically everyone has speculated about and I think it's pretty obvious that it's to prepare the market for the fact he's going to leave. It doesn't help that his favorite coach just walked away as well
his two brothers are there.I think Quinn leaving Vancouver is a given. I don’t think it’s a given that he’s destined for New Jersey. Not yet at least.
his two brothers are there.
Offering more would be like, "we have two fully grown clones of your brothers." If money was the issue, he'd resign with Vancouver. You have a blindspot. He wants to play WITH his brothers. Not hang out during down time. Hang outs at hotels. At team events, At practice. Things you don't get from being on different teams.I’m aware. Are the Devils going to trade for him and pay him 11-12mil? Someone will likely offer him more than that on the open market. I think more will go into his decision than whether he can have sleepovers in Newark with his younger brothers.
In what way?Larkin vs zib isn't even a question. You take Larkin 10/10. Not as great a scorer but he brings more to the table and is a culture shifter.
"f*** Jerry we traded for J. Staal, I just thought it was the good one"
Offering more would be like, "we have two fully grown clones of your brothers." If money was the issue, he'd resign with Vancouver. You have a blindspot. He wants to play WITH his brothers. Not hang out during down time. Hang outs at hotels. At team events, At practice. Things you don't get from being on different teams.
You're entitled to "rent" Quinn for his last three years but you're deluding yourself if you think he'd resign with us once he's a UFA. New Jersey, a division rival, would have to trade both Hughes brothers to us for that to happen. Please, if you have a proposal on the trade board NJ fans would accept for those two, maybe then you can report back and tell me "it's possible."
K. Miller for Peterka would be a nice move if Buffalo didn't have 50 left defensemen
Zib is a part of this zombie core and pulling him out for a guy like Larkin move the needle on changing that roomIn what way?
Correct, and to that end Rutherford even quipped about the way to keep Quinn would be to trade for his brothers.Offering more would be like, "we have two fully grown clones of your brothers." If money was the issue, he'd resign with Vancouver. You have a blindspot. He wants to play WITH his brothers. Not hang out during down time. Hang outs at hotels. At team events, At practice. Things you don't get from being on different teams.
You're entitled to "rent" Quinn for his last three years but you're deluding yourself if you think he'd resign with us once he's a UFA. New Jersey, a division rival, would have to trade both Hughes brothers to us for that to happen. Please, if you have a proposal on the trade board NJ fans would accept for those two, maybe then you can report back and tell me "it's possible."
Conversely, if laffy was playing even "well" everyone would lose their shit if the rangers traded him. The league has five years of seeing what he is so I'm not sure there any surprise on that.they'd be nuts to trade Lafreniere now, his value is as low as possible right now. this place loves to sell low and buy high.
Conversely, if laffy was playing even "well" everyone would lose their shit if the rangers traded him. The league has five years of seeing what he is so I'm not sure there any surprise on that.
Also, how can people say don't trade laffy when his value is at its lowest but then also be trying to trade Miller at ever opportunity when his perceived value is near its lowest and he needs a contract?
People sure do hate consistency