He's screaming for the sake of screaming without at least offering some of the tangible benefits that Torts does.
Sullivan has never had any success in the NHL without a half dozen Hall of Famers in his lineup and look at the roster we would be giving him.
At least Torts has proven he can work with shit. If anything, one of this weaknesses is that he likes shit a little bit too much.
Yes, his team was old. I got news for everyone: the Rangers aren't young.
"He likes shit a little bit too much." This part had me DED! LOL
The Rangers are both young and old with a little bit of a gulf in the middle of "Prime." Basically half of the F Corps is over 30, and the other half is under 25. It'll be tricky to balance for the next guy.
The D is a little more even spread. Not as young, but not as old. Fox in his prime in the middle.
(Not disagreeing, just adding.)
I'm not a fan of the Sully idea. I don't trust him to find that balance. Compared to some truly awful candidates however, I could stomach it. It would totally be predictable and "more of the same" because they're sheepish to try another inexperienced coach after Quinn, but I'll take being "the normal amount of mad at the team's decisions."
Q or Babcock would infuriate me. Messier would be straight up embarrassing as a fan. I'd rather get Torts for the memes and expect nothing for a season or two.
I don't have a "favorite" option outside of Knoblauch right now (leaning on familiarity with the younger portion of the team). I'm open to being convinced on anyone that's not a hell no. Like if I got to do the interviews. People are pumping Carle's tires and he's intriguing.
D coach is going to be a huge factor. I don't know much about who the actual candidates are. We just need a structure/scheme that the team understands, can execute, and suits them in the first place.
All I know is that I have Sylvain Lefebvre PTSD.