I think this was true back when they were winning. I'm relatively certain that most people were worried of the concept of him being fired when Dubas was hired 2 seasons ago (when we did have an opening) because of where that would have led (better than Lavi? Probably, but that isn't a tough bar to clear.) We have even more data than we did then and we should be even more worried because it's a real possibility now.
Since 2019, they've been owned by the Isles (twice, swept once!) and KO'd by the NYR (in a series they should have probably won sure, but it still happened.)
I don't think it's about being contrarian, it's about identifying who he is as a coach and applying his philosophy to the current roster. Simply put, it doesn't mesh and I don't like his style of hockey to begin with. You can't win with WEEEEEEE hockey unless you're either just so overwhelmingly good (see: Pitt in 2016) where you can bull doze anyone or you're good enough and you get some really favorable matchups along the way (see: Colorado in 2022.) Part of coaching is adjusting to what you have and he didn't do that in Pitt and he would have to do that here.
He doesn't have the same baggage as Lavi (we don't know how he'd integrate young players into the lineup because the Pens have had none! The last time he did have them he did a good job, but that was 9 years ago) but it would be the laziest, most uninspired hire of all time.
At the end of the day I'll just put it this way:
We've seen how bad the Metro has been the last 3 seasons.
The Pens have missed the playoffs all 3 years. that says a lot.