TheTakedown
Puck is Life
- Jul 11, 2012
- 13,837
- 1,743
No, it's not against the spirit of the contract. A no trade clause has NEVER protected a single player from being waived. As a matter of fact it typically happens but the player is usually not claimed and goes to the minor league affiliate.I do get that the players are annoyed, because especially the Goodrow thing was really an unorthodox way of doing business, probably the first time it was done in league history that way. And while no rules were broken, it was really against the spirit of the contract. I also get the feeling that Drury didn't really go to Trouba and Kreider before he sent out the memo, and they found out after the fact. Trouba obviously had previous discussions about a trade that he declined, but I think Drury didn't ask or inform him this time around, and neither Kreider. I can see how that rubs the players the wrong way. There are many cut-throat organizations and general managers around the league. Drury took it to the extreme.
All that said, it is still truly unprecedented how this type of stuff could break the club in a way that it did. There is no excuse. If you have a shitty person as a coach, you can understand it more easily because you are working and interacting on a daily basis. That is not the case with the general manager. You can talk among yourselves about how shitty GM and person Drury is, and still do your job.
If Goodrow needed security here, he was more than welcome to negotiate a $2.6M/AAV contract with a no movement clause. He did not.
The same goes for trouba.
I am sick of people using this as an excuse as to why Drury is a mean GM. Vegas abuses EVERY available loophole to move players around it results in a successful team.