No team has mentioned what they would have offered (and if they were really keen surely they've already contacted Seattle with a similar offer and the Kraken are weighing up whether to sell 'high' on him?)I don't. Already reports teams would have made a better offer for Kakko had they known Drury was looking to ship him out so fast. He easily would have brought back a 2nd. Guy is a NHL player who will have a long career, whether this board wants to admit that or not.
It does raise the question of perceived value again though. Is a late 2nd and let's say a 23 year old prospect going at 0.5ppg in the AHL a better offer than 3/6/the assimiliator, because the pick is higher? I assume some GMs (and fans) say yes while others say no.
If Drury knows he can get a 4th for Lindgren at the deadline, but if he includes that 3rd he can likely turn the trade into a 2nd and 5th, does it make it any better?