Why, yes, @Edge and @jas. That *is* what I was suggesting.
Eh, I imagine he would come around to a 6'1", 203lb center who scored 40-48-88 in 53GP in his last season in the AJHL, if he could be convinced that the kid's pedestrian showing his freshman year was primarily due to a shitshow coaching job by Granato & co. that may have dragged down everyone on the team.
And if not...
I'll survive.
Does anyone know why Trevor Gillies is trending on hockeydb? Always irks me that a guy genuinely worse at hockey than I am got to play so much in the NHL.
Maybe Morgan Barron becomes the #2 Center.
Krav on any 4th line is a travesty.Kid needs to be in the top 9.Getting 7 minutes a night on the 4th line does nothing for his developmentIf we don't bring back Strome, do we think Chytil could do well paired with Panarin? That would allow us to bring in a lower cost veteran to play the 3rd/4th line. Was thinking maybe Mikko Koivu. Would bring leadership and would give KK another Finn on the roster.
Kreider-Zib-Buch
Panarin-Chytil-Kakko
Laf-Koivu-Fast
Lemieux-Howden-Krav
Apparently the asking price at the deadline was out of this world.A guy I'd really like to get is Josh Anderson from CLB.
He's 6'3", 225 lbs, 26 yrs old RW, who plays with an edge.
He's an RFA making $1.85M, had some issues with CLB mgmt when negotiating his last contract and was rumored to be on the block. JD knows him well from CLB...
If we don't bring back Strome, do we think Chytil could do well paired with Panarin? That would allow us to bring in a lower cost veteran to play the 3rd/4th line. Was thinking maybe Mikko Koivu. Would bring leadership and would give KK another Finn on the roster.
Kreider-Zib-Buch
Panarin-Chytil-Kakko
Laf-Koivu-Fast
Lemieux-Howden-Krav
And there are teams that will be more desperate than us to get him thus probably raising priceApparently the asking price at the deadline was out of this world.
Why, yes, @Edge and @jas. That *is* what I was suggesting.
Eh, I imagine he would come around to a 6'1", 203lb center who scored 40-48-88 in 53GP in his last season in the AJHL, if he could be convinced that the kid's pedestrian showing his freshman year was primarily due to a shitshow coaching job by Granato & co. that may have dragged down everyone on the team.
And if not...
I'll survive.
100000 percentKrav on any 4th line is a travesty.Kid needs to be in the top 9.Getting 7 minutes a night on the 4th line does nothing for his development
Maybe...but JD is the best person to negotiate with CLB. He knows the player, his worth and what CLB would want and we have the assetsAnd there are teams that will be more desperate than us to get him thus probably raising price
I think its less about the pick and more about the player available at that pick. I think Lundell is worth trading up for, regardless of having Lafreniere.I guess I'll take that as your acknowledgement it was a bad idea. Nothing wrong with wanting to move up but in a draft where we have the #1 pick we can settle for our next pick being in the 20's.
What are you willing to trade? Don’t forget he had shoulder surgery.Maybe...but JD is the best person to negotiate with CLB. He knows the player, his worth and what CLB would want and we have the assets
If we don't bring back Strome, do we think Chytil could do well paired with Panarin? That would allow us to bring in a lower cost veteran to play the 3rd/4th line. Was thinking maybe Mikko Koivu. Would bring leadership and would give KK another Finn on the roster.
Kreider-Zib-Buch
Panarin-Chytil-Kakko
Laf-Koivu-Fast
Lemieux-Howden-Krav
Fair point. If we are going to do that, I think it is better to overpay from an assets standpoint than lock ourselves into a long cap commitment.I think its less about the pick and more about the player available at that pick. I think Lundell is worth trading up for, regardless of having Lafreniere.
You're right, Montreal is drooling for a player like him, as are many teams and it's harder for us to trade with a division rival, but we have plenty of assets that I don't belive other teams have and with the cap being flat for the next few years it might limit the number of teams in the mix. Also, don't forget the JD/CLB factor...What are you willing to trade? Don’t forget he had shoulder surgery.
I know Montreal is a team that would overpay for him
JMO, but I think people love the idea of Holloway more than what he actually is.
Wisco was a f***ing mess, no doubt about it, but his problems went beyond the coaching. I don't see anything above a 3rd line ceiling (and a Howden 3rd liner) unless he finds a way to stop being allergic to playing in the paint and actually starts trying to use his size/speed to beat defenders 1 on 1, rather than opting for low percentage shots that have almost no chance of amounting to anything.
Tools are great, but they're just pretty packaging if they aren't utilized properly. I think it was @effen who said that he seems like a guy who loves to be a hammer, but is afraid of being the nail. That sums up Holloway in a nutshell IMO
I hear ya. But then again, given the evidence of only a single season, this is the sort of thing that very well *could* be the result of bad coaching...JMO, but I think people love the idea of Holloway more than what he actually is.
Wisco was a f***ing mess, no doubt about it, but his problems went beyond the coaching. I don't see anything above a 3rd line ceiling (and a Howden 3rd liner) unless he finds a way to stop being allergic to playing in the paint and actually starts trying to use his size/speed to beat defenders 1 on 1, rather than opting for low percentage shots that have almost no chance of amounting to anything.
Tools are great, but they're just pretty packaging if they aren't utilized properly. I think it was @effen who said that he seems like a guy who loves to be a hammer, but is afraid of being the nail. That sums up Holloway in a nutshell IMO
I know it's fun to speculate about the Rangers shanking Tampa in the gut with an offer sheet, but given the history of trading between the two franchises, I don't think they'd want to nuke that bridge. In fact, would Gorton rather have Tampa in his pocket by helping them out of their cap crunch? Maybe the Rangers, who are looking for more "north-south" guys and want to "get harder to play against," would be interested in someone like Palat or Killorn? 2 and 3 years left on their deals, respectively. Both guys can play in the top six but bring enough to the table that they're not going to be out of place on the 3rd line if they get pushed down by new arrivals. Both bring a bit of a different element to the roster and might make the team more comfortable exploring options for trading Buch for defensive help?
Obviously it would likely require Hank retiring to free up enough money. Plus, these aren't guys who fit into the long-term plan. However, they might be good stepping stones to help the team feel comfortable addressing other needs while also improving their versatility in the short term.