Going to be a lot of grumpy posters here when they find out we aren't giving away our draft pick this season.
Drury is not going full rebuild. All he's doing is shipping out some garbage.
Going to be a lot of grumpy posters here when they find out we aren't giving away our draft pick this season.
Drury is not going full rebuild. All he's doing is shipping out some garbage.
Again, we're all really looking forward to Drury's grand plan.Going to be a lot of grumpy posters here when they find out we aren't giving away our draft pick this season.
Drury is not going full rebuild. All he's doing is shipping out some garbage.
Replace Kreider and Mika with 2 other players who help the locker room, and make players around them play better.Again, we're all really looking forward to Drury's grand plan.
1) Take 76 goals out of the lineup
2) Do nothing?
3) Win the Cup I guess
I mostly agree with this. Drury, to his credit, has *identified* that there are issues with this team. I believe the switch of mindset happened slightly too late (Lindgren should never have been extended, Trouba should have been informed he could either waive or be scratched in the off-season), but at least it was identified.I’m actually more bullish on Drury as a GM than most, I think he’s made enough moves that show he’s a good enough talent evaluator (on the whole) and has shown he will move on from guys who shouldn’t be part of the solution here and is eager to make moves.
However and it’s a big however, I think he’s clearly demonstrated he is atrocious at the communicating and relationships side of this with his players and from reporting it seems like he’s somewhat a paranoid type. The organization could probably benefit from a President to come in and handle the areas Drury has shortcomings in instead of him being both President and GM.
but at least the vibes will be better! And we know teams that win the cup get by on vibesAgain, we're all really looking forward to Drury's grand plan.
1) Take 76 goals out of the lineup
2) Do nothing?
3) Win the Cup I guess
Great plan, now keep in mind that if you want to be a Stanley cup contender it would behoove the Rangers to replace Kreider with someone as good as he was a couple of years ago, same with Zibanejad. And also the defense is still atrocious. Plus you also want to ship out Panarin so you have to account for that as well.Replace Kreider and Mika with 2 other players who help the locker room, and make players around them play better.
Who are those players, I don't know. That's for Drury to figure out. Maybe we get Kakko and Buch.
I wouldn’t be surprised to see him play well into his 40s. That guy is a freakThe gear holding the Capitals together will turn 40 this year.
They're still in horrible shape long-term.
They have some nice little players, but the only guy in their organization that anybody is planning for is about to be on Social Security.
They better hope Leonard really hits.
I get what you're saying but it's not who I would model after.
It's not what he's saying, it's what he's not saying.Forget Messier, pretend he's not in the picture. What about the points he's making is incorrect?
Dont need to account for their point production point for point. Losing them will make the team better and will make other players play better. I'm really not too concerned about losing those 2, nobody should if they watched them this season.Great plan, now keep in mind that if you want to be a Stanley cup contender it would behoove the Rangers to replace Kreider with someone as good as he was a couple of years ago, same with Zibanejad. And also the defense is still atrocious. Plus you also want to ship out Panarin so you have to account for that as well.
It's not what he's saying, it's what he's not saying.
This team has a talent problem. The roster is bad. It's horribly constructed and has holes that NHL teams can't have.
Maybe there's also a culture problem. Nobody is saying those things are mutually exclusive and nobody is saying don't solve that.
The problem is, the guys seen as a culture problem (Panarin, Mika, Kreider, sometimes Fox, not from everyone) are like 90% of this team's offensive talent.
Absolutely nothing has been proposed, from Messier or the posters siding with him, on replacing that talent.
It's just "fix the compete level and the team would be good." They won't be.
Again, maybe that issue exists but this team misses the playoffs if they work their asses off. They're not a good hockey team.
As much as we pine over Dubinsky and Callahan breaking limbs to win a game 2-1, let's be honest, those were also dark times. And the best versions of those teams were after those guys when they got more skilled.
Messier has no interest in skill. He had no interest in skill when he lobbied to trade half of the '94 team.
Again, maybe the culture is an issue, but this board is obsessed with culture to the point of really not caring about roster construction. And this board can think what they want but when Mark Messier, who actually is a guy who might actually get a job, posts something like that, this is the response.
Oh I dont think anybody would claim his past 2 seasons to be on par with a top 10 center. I just hope for the sake of the team that he will get back to that kind of level next season.For the sake of the team I would love to make this argument but Z's slip over the last two seasons (so pretty large sample size) makes it a difficult assertion to stand by.
While if I had to make a bet I'd bet on the Rangers getting back to playoffs next year, in terms of managing the risk I'd also rather give up this year's pick, rather than deal with uncertainty. But if the Rangers (I mean Shesterkin) steal at least one game - it could be the case.Picking 10th-12thOA this year, and handing Pittsburgh next year's pick, turns my stomach.
I know we're going to do it, but the risk/reward feels completely out of whack.
You're heavily discounting Shesterkin and Fox. Also rightly not including Panarin (and Zibanejad) as part of the core because of their age - doesn't mean that they are not on the team (if the Drury doesn't do anything at least for one, maybe more years)Actually, not at all.
I think most people think this sucks.
It’s called rebuilding . It’s our only hope.Great plan, now keep in mind that if you want to be a Stanley cup contender it would behoove the Rangers to replace Kreider with someone as good as he was a couple of years ago, same with Zibanejad. And also the defense is still atrocious. Plus you also want to ship out Panarin so you have to account for that as well.
I don’t disagree with anything you say really, but I bet after Ovi leaves, PLD reverts back to lazy PLD and Chychrun to LITR man.I'll also say that I think the Caps show you can turn things around pretty quick with some good signings and just generally having SOME talent in the pipeline that's brought along well, along with a decent f***in' head coach
I really dont' think Protas and McMichael were looked at as these high end prospects, but they're playing large roles now. Caps wen tout and got some good players in Strome and Chychrun and took a gamble on PLD, but generally they just...put a solid team together without fretting about whether they had a top draft pick or tanked for years and years or whatever.
The Rangers could do that but it requires pulling their heads out of the asses and actually getting skilled players and putting them in positions to succeed and killing this team culture that's made them uncoachable for years now
I think the Caps are playing over their heads this season but they also look like they could comfortably be a playoff team going forward as well
I agree OV is kinda stirring the drink for them but I think the dropoff is to a mid playoff team unless they completely crater
The Rangers already have some better pieces than the Caps. They could turn themselves into a good team with some smart moves. But like...They should dumped Lindgren and traded for Chychrun last year or something
They haven't shown they are interested in making smart moves, just ones for "big skates OK grit"
I find it mind-blowing, people can make comments like this after watching this team all season. We blew shit because of those vibes.but at least the vibes will be better! And we know teams that win the cup get by on vibes
They anticipate and act on that assumption. The Rangers sit back, read and react, and play like they met each other 5 minutes ago as they play zone offense or back up to the dots.The thing with Washington is that the team culture is rock solid. Have you guys seen all the videos from the tunnel before every game this year? That whole team is so bought in and on the same page and that is WHEN groups play over their heads. Which they absolutely have. I would bet my right foot they fizzle out pretty bad in the playoffs. But that’s a locker room that is rock solid, that could absorb a guy like PLD and get him on track without missing a beat. They’re a stronger roster than us going forward for sure with underrated pieces - behind Carlson/Chychrun is Roy, Fehervary and Sandin with a devent tandem in net. Protas went stupid this year. The Dubois gamble paid off to the tune of 65 points, over 60 blocks and 50% on over 1100 face offs. But they’re definitely a middling playoff team with no elite talent coming up and nothing really special on the roster. It’s the culture and the buy in of basically playing alongside an icon.
There is some top-tier level gaslighting going on that to me circles back to don't touch my sacred cows and blame the bottom 20% of the roster. Same as always.I find it mind-blowing, people can make comments like this after watching this team all season. We blew shit because of those vibes.
This is not who I chose as the core, this is who the team thinks is the core according to Brooks.You're heavily discounting Shesterkin and Fox. Also rightly not including Panarin (and Zibanejad) as part of the core because of their age - doesn't mean that they are not on the team (if the Drury doesn't do anything at least for one, maybe more years)