- Sep 20, 2007
- 8,380
- 13,378
Replied in here after the game winner last night by accident lolHOLY f***
Signing Artemi Panarin was an acceptable Roster move.
Replied in here after the game winner last night by accident lolHOLY f***
Trouba, Lindgren and Goodrow have all been rock solid in the playoffs. The odds of any of them being gone next year are low in my opinion
I don't know what the heck is gonna happen with those three but I can tell you this Goodrow is playing better and I'm sure a team out there would trade for him. Certainly not attaching an asset to trade him.Trouba, Lindgren and Goodrow have all been rock solid in the playoffs. The odds of any of them being gone next year are low in my opinion
I'd argue that elevating their value may actually mean a team steps up to acquire them. Goodrow specifically as the team appears to have internal cheaper options
I'd argue that elevating their value may actually mean a team steps up to acquire them. Goodrow specifically as the team appears to have internal cheaper options
You’re right. Goodie has been getting better since the last month of the reg season.Rangers value team chemistry, as do I. I don’t see any of them moved barring something unforeseen with the cap
Neither Gustafsson nor Jones should be playing 1LD.its actually very easy: sign Gustafsson instead of Lindgren and play Jones
Neither Gustafsson nor Jones should be playing 1LD.
If that were true, they'd be playing over him. They are better offensively. That doesn't make them better suited to play 1LD.why not? they're both better than Lindgren
If that were true, they'd be playing over him. They are better offensively. That doesn't make them better suited to play 1LD.
If that were true, they'd be playing over him. They are better offensively. That doesn't make them better suited to play 1LD.
Do you think the Rangers could find a UFA who could fill in that Lindgren spot for a couple of years until a longer term option is found?
I look at the list of pending UFA's and I could see more than a few guys filling that role:
Dillon
Cole
Walker
Ekman-Larsson
The team really would only need a specific type of LD to fit there, not someone who cna play 22+ minutes a night.
On RD, it's a bit easier to find someone who could likely at least replace Trouba's minutes. Roy, Demelo, Zadorov, Kulikov.
Low key, I wouldn't hate taking a flyer on Kylington out of Calgary.
That list isn't very inspiring. I just don't see the point of moving Lindgren unless we are adding a clear upgrade.Do you think the Rangers could find a UFA who could fill in that Lindgren spot for a couple of years until a longer term option is found?
I look at the list of pending UFA's and I could see more than a few guys filling that role:
Dillon
Cole
Walker
Ekman-Larsson
The team really would only need a specific type of LD to fit there, not someone who cna play 22+ minutes a night.
On RD, it's a bit easier to find someone who could likely at least replace Trouba's minutes. Roy, Demelo, Zadorov, Kulikov.
Low key, I wouldn't hate taking a flyer on Kylington out of Calgary.
That list isn't very inspiring. I just don't see the point of moving Lindgren unless we are adding a clear upgrade.
So’s bringing Trocheck who “would block Chytil and we won’t be able to resign” smh!Replied in here after the game winner last night by accident lol
Signing Artemi Panarin was an acceptable Roster move.
Let’s leave this to summer. So far Goodrow has made great contributions to this run.I'd argue that elevating their value may actually mean a team steps up to acquire them. Goodrow specifically as the team appears to have internal cheaper options
Do you think the Rangers could find a UFA who could fill in that Lindgren spot for a couple of years until a longer term option is found?
I look at the list of pending UFA's and I could see more than a few guys filling that role:
Dillon
Cole
Walker
Ekman-Larsson
The team really would only need a specific type of LD to fit there, not someone who cna play 22+ minutes a night.
On RD, it's a bit easier to find someone who could likely at least replace Trouba's minutes. Roy, Demelo, Zadorov, Kulikov.
Low key, I wouldn't hate taking a flyer on Kylington out of Calgary.
It’s not there. And won’t be unless There’s a trade.That list isn't very inspiring. I just don't see the point of moving Lindgren unless we are adding a clear upgrade.
I like Gus. But he’s a bottom pairing guy. He’s always been that. He had some great years in Chicago, then cal signed him to a bigger $$ deal and gave him a bigger opportunity, and it didn’t go well.Lindgren and Gus had nearly identical ice time at 5v5 last night. i think Gus would be fine with Fox, but we also have Miller who could be the 1LD (according to ice time he already is). i wouldn't be worried at all with Miller-Gus-Jones down the left side next year.
That list isn't very inspiring. I just don't see the point of moving Lindgren unless we are adding a clear upgrade.
I'm not worried about that. He doesn't score enough to command a significant raise.Or he prices himself out, obviously.
Gus has been horrendous for months now. Same in the playoffs, he is constantly lost in the d end letting his man get open for goals, he can’t handle the puck, his passes have been crap, and all of his shots are getting blocked. Let Gus walk in the offseason, and let jones play his spot.
if we win the cup this season we can give all of them 8 year 8 millions deals with 8 years of NMC for all I careI'd argue that elevating their value may actually mean a team steps up to acquire them. Goodrow specifically as the team appears to have internal cheaper options
Trouba, Lindgren and Goodrow have all been rock solid in the playoffs. The odds of any of them being gone next year are low in my opinion
That list isn't very inspiring. I just don't see the point of moving Lindgren unless we are adding a clear upgrade.