Dr. Ogrodnick
Registered User
- Jan 10, 2007
- 3,848
- 1,876
I'll take Edge's sources over your biased beliefs.I don't believe he was choking any teammate. Bunch of rumors.
I'll take Edge's sources over your biased beliefs.I don't believe he was choking any teammate. Bunch of rumors.
Big difference between Tony using his last straw and Georgiev, as far as we know, with his first offense. I would expect that he was spoken to and told not to resort to physical altercations.Don't care how you feel about TDA, but Georgiev needs to get gone next.
If sticks and stones applies to TDA, then it applies to the goalie as well.
Truth be told, he absolutely should have stopped that puck.
it is like an angry dog instead of getting proper training the owner just decided to shorten the leash.
When there are reports that Tony started it physically:When there are reports that Tony started it physically:
"So what? Teammates get in fights all the time. Sometimes it's even a bonding experience. Why should he lose his job over that?"
When there are reports that Georgiev struck first:
"So why isn't Georgiev losing his job???"
It's hilarious.
Two thoughts.
1. (My thought) Tony is super active on social media and he has no doubt read that Fox and Trouba are the future of the team on the right side and Lundqvist (and Schneider) are both coming. He knew he didn't figure in the long term plans of the team. @Avery16 is right...his value was trade value and it is now diminished (we think)
2. (Dave Maloney's thought on radio broadcast last night) If Ryan Lindgren was a higher profile player, he would be a great captain for this team. The Rangers need a younger captain.
As childish as giving shit to your goalie after losing a game? Come on, hockey is a game where fighting is ALLOWED. These guys are brought up to only take so much. I'm sure Georgiev was given a talking toI still do not see a reason for laying hands on someone.
ADA had the waiver coming, to say he had a blocker to head coming is where you lose me. Physical altercations with someone you have a disagreement with is childish.
it is like an angry dog instead of getting proper training the owner just decided to shorten the leash.
Man. This place is more tedious when there's actual news than when there isn't.
You're not moving him cause he cost a game, your moving him because he got physical with a player that was giving him a hard time about being a sive
Honestly, it would be very interesting. He is outspoken and supportive of LGBT causes. This recent event made me think of that incident against the Isles with the homophobic slur and gesture, on TV, that resulted in I believe a 2 game suspension for Wisnewski. 8 games for one statement, 2 for another. Today, I imagine it's a reversal. With the other situation resulting in rehab and a defacto season long suspension. I don't know if we could accurately predict how Avery would far today.12 Years ago this happened.
“I just want to comment on how it's become like a common thing in the NHL for guys to fall in love with my sloppy seconds."
I wonder what would happen if Sean Avery played in todays NHL? Social media is so much more prevalent these days. I would imagine there would be internet lynch mobs that react in the same fashion as the Herman followers after the article posted. Or would Herman post it all? Same political sides applying.
Back then Avery or today Avery? Today Avery...I don't know. Strikes as a MAGA, considering some of his socials content. Could be wrong.Honestly, it would be very interesting. He is outspoken and supportive of LGBT causes. This recent event made me think of that incident against the Isles with the homophobic slur and gesture, on TV, that resulted in I believe a 2 game suspension for Wisnewski. 8 games for one statement, 2 for another. Today, I imagine it's a reversal. With the other situation resulting in rehab and a defacto season long suspension. I don't know if we could accurately predict how Avery would far today.
Seems almost like it'd be better asset management to sit on ADA and buy him out at season's end rather than trade him at half salary, unless we could actually get something of value for him.
2.6 mil next year is worse than 800k for the two following years