True Blue
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 30,092
- 8,362
You have not explained a thing. The Rangers are not in the position that the Sens were in. They do not NEED to trade anyone? They are not over a barrel. Buchnevich is not going UFA like Stone was.It's not disingenuous for all the reasons I explained. Do you need several people to repeat to you why it's not?
Sorry it obliterates your silly position.
So for the 20th time, what does the trade profile look like? Why do you keep running from this question?And as I've said repeatedly it doesn't need to be a one to one trade. The fill ins for the Stone trade were minor and could easily be replicated.
Seriously? You are going to beat your chest over this one deal in which the scenarios are still not the same no matter how hard you try to white wash this? THIS is your example of something COULD happening? Ok. It COULD happen. And Smith can score 10 goals in tomorrow's game. That COULD happen as well.I did name one, the Stone trade, it's a template for what I'm advocating. It didn't even take me ten seconds of searching.
Going RFA and going UFA are two different things. Having the ability to resign a player (that the Rangers do) or not having such ability (Ottawa did not) makes for a world of difference.A team with motive to move a first player for a prospect due to that team's circumstances: Ottawa's circumstances being that it was entering a rebuild and didn't have Stone locked up to a long term deal that would fit it's cap structure moving forward into a rebuild. Our similar circumstances would be we are still searching for a young center and we don't have Buch locked up to a long term deal at an affordable cap hit for our structure and his role moving forward.
I actually agree with you that if Buch was locked up at $3.5m for the next 4 seasons we aren't having this discussion.
The problem here, as it was with Ottawa, is that Buch isn't locked up at a price that matches his role moving forward. It's his lack of term, just like it was with Stone in Ottawa.
So these situations are about as similar as can reasonably be expected.
The 'Send heading into a rebuild and not having the cash to resign their own player is not the same thing as the Rangers heading into playoff contention with plenty of money to resign whomever they feel like are two different situations. There is nothing remotely similar about them.
It doesn't happen. Discovering ONE or TWO occurrences in which the situations are not at all the same, does not a strong case make.Yeah, just as wrong every time you repeat it.
First you say "It doesn't happen."
You have been banging the drum for one off season, two trading deadlines and two drafts that this was going to happen. And NOTHING happened.
What is truly pathetic is that you coming up with what you did as evidence of likelihood. Have at it, I guess. Does not change the fact that such items really do not occur otherswise you would have a laundry list of examples. You do not. Hope your EA sports is has a long enough battery to keep your fantasies alive. Playoff teams do not trade away top liners for unproven prospects. Learn it. Love it. Live it.Pathetic argument.