egelband
Registered User
- Sep 6, 2008
- 16,214
- 15,078
i thought he was pretty good. didn't see a ton of him, but he seemed fine to me. fine as a seventh D. no?I don't think Kampfer will see NHL ice unless there are several injuries.
i thought he was pretty good. didn't see a ton of him, but he seemed fine to me. fine as a seventh D. no?I don't think Kampfer will see NHL ice unless there are several injuries.
Fill out the two Q's and thats my team for next season. Trade Holden, obviously try to trade Staal, but otherwise, thats the team. If you can trade Holden, Kampfer takes 7D. If you can trade Staal, Graves takes his spot, and you shuffle the pairs. If Andersson makes the team, Grabner down to 4th line, Jensen to 13F. If Nieves makes team, take away the 4C ?.
Kreider-Zibanejad-Buchnevich
Nash-Miller-Zuccarello
Vesey-Hayes-Grabner
Jensen-?-Fast
?
McD-Skjei
Smith-Bereglazov
Staal-DeAngelo
Holden
Hank
Pavelec
I would much rather do NOTHING tomorrow than set this franchise back further
The more and more i think about it I agree with you. Shattenkirk is not putting us over the top. I look at the other free agents and I'm like blah. I don't want a 38 year old with slow shot knees for more than one year. I dont want a bonino or gagner that will cost 3.5-4.5 million per for 3-5 years. Same with Marleau.
I am mentally ready for an upcoming season without the playoffs. So by some miracle getting a top 5 pick would do this franchise some real good. Maybe if we are not close to a playoff spot come trade deadline we get something decent for grabs, nash and someone like a holden.
but with That being said because Hank has about 2-3 years left the Rangers probably won't sit back and accept being a non-playoff team. Is that the right thinking? probably not but thats the way it is.
This team should not let a goalie coming off a non NHL-starter caliber season dictate their thinking.
I am mentally ready for an upcoming season without the playoffs.
Even if they do nothing else this offseason, I'm confident the Rangers make the playoffs.
I'm not cool with how his last name is spelled. Minimally, the H can go.Not saying that he is a piece that fits our puzzle, but I definitely thrink Desharnais can be a good 4th line C that also is capable for shorter stretches to fill in as an injury replacement higher up the lineup.
DD is actually a pretty similar to Dom Moore. He wasn't a top 6 center and hence failed since people -- and himself too probably -- thought so. But they had a lot of abilities that made sense on a 4th line. DD is good taking the puck up ice making his wingers better.
I can understand if the gap between what we're willing to offer and what Shattenkirk will take is too big. But not even going for him, especially if they're trying to sign Thornton/Marleau, is ridiculous....
I would much rather do NOTHING tomorrow than set this franchise back further
Surprising amount of solid old guys out there. Like, tons of them.
Jagr, I'd welcome back on this team any day, be it this year or in five. Obviously lots of players who you'd consider "better Rangers" cause of how long they were with the team, but the guy does hold pretty much every single season record for the team.
Hartnell is one of my favorite players in the league, but also one of the guys (and there's very few) I couldn't imagine as a Ranger. Would love him, but feel weird.
If Thornton can get Nash to grow out his beard, he'd pretty much be our best signing ever. Or at least teach Kevin Hayes how to play hockey.
I don't think Kampfer will see NHL ice unless there are several injuries.