So we trade all of our good players for other teams later picks and prospects, while we give other teams top 5-10 picks that own the leafs pick?
Benn looks done. Can’t replace Marner on the cheap.That seems new.
They have way more cap space this year. No need to get rid of Domi who was just about the only guy to show up in game 7.as good of a line I think Knies - Matthews - Kane could be. I'd probably only sign Kane if we somehow get rid of Domi.
In theory IF they had the self awareness to accept this core ain’t winning shit, AND had the stones to have a “core” yard sale they would have plenty of picks and prospects to rebuild with, but it’s just a opium dream……..We can't rebuild we have no draft picks.
Team depth, what a novel idea…….Replace 2 players with 3.
We're talking $22mm in Cap Space, not trying to pay 3 players with $10mm.
Knies has earned a raise. That's it.
So no 1st. liners coming in, but definitely can get 3 players capable of playing on the 2nd. line.
I think that, now that we know that Reilly is probably staying, I wouldn't touch the D-core in the summer. These guys have all earned another year. They were mostly great (except for carrying the puck out of the D zone).
However, I would tell Rielly (in a polite way) that he has to spend the summer training and come to camp thinner and more fit than ever. If he starts sucking, I'd trade him during the year. I think that's fair for everyone. That puts Rielly's fate in his own hands.
don't forget they control his press box time too..........NMC ...
Leafs control is ice time and playing time.
Yep, that's ice time / playing time.don't forget they control his press box time too..........
Has anyone heard if Mitch has said anything about waiving negtiation rights only? I know that it's a no to a sign and trade. I don't see how it changes anything for him if either or both Leafs and him are certain for it to be over. It would obviously have to be to a team that he's interested in. Even ask Ferris for 3 teams to work with.
If he's going to Vegas, you would have to think that they ask Stone to waive. That would be nearly a quarter of the cap tied up into 2 RW. What team would do that...
For sure, I get that its inferred. I just wanted to know if he has publicly said anything specific. The only thing that changes for him is that he gets to hear one pitch a few weeks early.Believe his agent has said they don’t care about the 8th year. That would mean there’s no reason to waive.
Makes sense when you just care about getting max dollars. Short contract and wait for the cap to rise.
Just bury him. It costs 200k against the cap.It looks like a no-brainer to buy out Reaves. Gain $900K this year and lose $425 next. That's it.
Or just bury him this year and lose $200k this year and thats it.It looks like a no-brainer to buy out Reaves. Gain $900K this year and lose $425 next. That's it.
It looks like a no-brainer to buy out Reaves. Gain $900K this year and lose $425 next. That's it.
SoldOr just bury him this year and lose $200k this year and thats it.