They HAVE to turn him heel when he returns or the crowds are going to eat him alive more so than normal after this.
WWE: Roman Reigns suspended 30 days for violating wellness policy
- Thread starter BonMorrison
- Start date
They HAVE to turn him heel when he returns or the crowds are going to eat him alive more so than normal after this.
Engebretson
Thank you, sweet rabbit
BonMorrison
Registered User
saintflannel
Registered User
- Oct 6, 2011
- 5,213
- 85
Kimi
Registered User
Le Barron de HF
Justin make me proud
GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 193,197
- 43,604
Shoalzie
Trust me!
BonMorrison
Registered User
Virtanen18
SAMCRO
weastern bias
worst team in the league
Wow, this fell out of the sky, now I've got to wonder how much, if at all, his push suffers
This could end up being a good thing, best case scenario he's now forced into his obvious natural heel role
There's still a decent chance he just comes back to be 'The Guy' again at Battleground though
This could end up being a good thing, best case scenario he's now forced into his obvious natural heel role
There's still a decent chance he just comes back to be 'The Guy' again at Battleground though
BostonBob
4 Ever The Greatest
from today's pwinsider.com:
With the announcement today that WWE has suspended Roman Reigns for a failure of the WWE Wellness Policy, here are some quick questions that we might not get immediate answers to, but are worth asking today:
*What did Reigns fail for, if anything? After all, Hornswoggle has made it public that his own lone Wellness suspension happened because he couldn't provide a urine sample in the time allotted for him by testers. So, what caused the suspension for Reigns?
*If Reigns failed a Wellness test, when did he take it?
*When did WWE get the results? Did WWE know of the results before Tuesday 6/21?
*Could this be the first ever occurrence of WWE changing their World Heavyweight championship because a Wellness suspension? It's happened with secondary belts but never for the most important title in the company.
*How much will WWE creative change as of tonight considering that just last night, they set the stage for the Battleground main event?
*With Reigns suspended until July 21st, how does WWE handle him at the Draft on 7/19?
*If Reigns is suspended until 7/21, does that mean Reigns gets to keep his main event at the Battleground PPV on 7/24? He would technically have served his penance and would be cleared to wrestle that night, correct?
*Should WWE reward Reigns with a return from suspension with a PPV main event? If so, what message would that send to the locker room and the audience?
*Plus, If WWE decides to keep him in the Battleground main event, how will they explain his absence in the build up to the PPV?
*If Roman is pulled from the Battleground PPV, do we get Dean Ambrose vs. Seth Rollins or does the company slot someone else in?
*Is it fair game to have Reigns interfere or make a cameo during the match if he's pulled?
*How big will the mainstream media attention be to Reigns being suspended?
*What level of trust does WWE put back in Reigns, who has been pushed as their made man for well over a year, now that he has publicly embarrassed the company and himself with the suspension?
*How evil will the fan reaction be when Reigns, who's already regularly getting raked over the coals, returns?
With the announcement today that WWE has suspended Roman Reigns for a failure of the WWE Wellness Policy, here are some quick questions that we might not get immediate answers to, but are worth asking today:
*What did Reigns fail for, if anything? After all, Hornswoggle has made it public that his own lone Wellness suspension happened because he couldn't provide a urine sample in the time allotted for him by testers. So, what caused the suspension for Reigns?
*If Reigns failed a Wellness test, when did he take it?
*When did WWE get the results? Did WWE know of the results before Tuesday 6/21?
*Could this be the first ever occurrence of WWE changing their World Heavyweight championship because a Wellness suspension? It's happened with secondary belts but never for the most important title in the company.
*How much will WWE creative change as of tonight considering that just last night, they set the stage for the Battleground main event?
*With Reigns suspended until July 21st, how does WWE handle him at the Draft on 7/19?
*If Reigns is suspended until 7/21, does that mean Reigns gets to keep his main event at the Battleground PPV on 7/24? He would technically have served his penance and would be cleared to wrestle that night, correct?
*Should WWE reward Reigns with a return from suspension with a PPV main event? If so, what message would that send to the locker room and the audience?
*Plus, If WWE decides to keep him in the Battleground main event, how will they explain his absence in the build up to the PPV?
*If Roman is pulled from the Battleground PPV, do we get Dean Ambrose vs. Seth Rollins or does the company slot someone else in?
*Is it fair game to have Reigns interfere or make a cameo during the match if he's pulled?
*How big will the mainstream media attention be to Reigns being suspended?
*What level of trust does WWE put back in Reigns, who has been pushed as their made man for well over a year, now that he has publicly embarrassed the company and himself with the suspension?
*How evil will the fan reaction be when Reigns, who's already regularly getting raked over the coals, returns?
Two days ago someone on Reddit posted that the he knows a guy from the Philly Inquirer and Roman got busted for steroids.
Alvarez says the company knew before MITB (so if there was any doubt whether he'd be at Battleground that can go to rest).
Dean's title reign may go longer though...
Alvarez says the company knew before MITB (so if there was any doubt whether he'd be at Battleground that can go to rest).
Dean's title reign may go longer though...
