Okay, I gotta jump in here and put something into persepective for people. Racking up points in junior or college does NOT make you a good prospect. I hate to burst the bubble of the point counters around here, but points do nothing for you unless you are a poolie. Showing growth makes you a good prospect.
What makes Robbie Schremp a good NHL prospect? What is it about him that says he will be an NHL player? Is it his ability to rack up a whack of points playing on a defending Memorial Cup champion that is stacked with talent? Is it the amazing PP% the Knights are clipping along at (Schremp has 13 of his 19 goals on the PP)? Are these the things that the Oilers were hoping to see from Schemp when they sent him down? Or do you think that they sent him down to work on his deficient skating? Or maybe learn the defensive side of the puck? Or maybe to be a leader on his team and become more of a professional? Do you think that maybe these things were the goals of the hockey club when they returned him to London? Schremp's 52 points is great, but his +8 is nothing to write home to mother about. Is he learning the defensive side of the puck? Is he meeting the objectives of the Oilers and becoming a strong two-way player?
What about Chucko? He was a big scorer in Tier-II but was told he needed to work on his skating and his two way play if he wanted to be an NHL player. He made that committment and impressed the hell out those in the NCAA with his two way play. Now he has to develop that scoring ability to go with that two way play. He's still a work in progress in that regard. The promising thing is that he has shown he knows how to score. Now its a matter of the player showing that he can do it at the college level. Will he do it? Who knows. He has two or three years to do that according to the hockey club, so there is no rush.
Who is the better prospect? Probably the one that is more likely to play in the NHL. Depending on the way the game is played will likely decide who is better. If the game remains like it presently is, Schremp has a chance to be a contributor and be the better player. His skating ability and defensive weakness will be ignored for his offensive flair. If the game reverts to where it was the past few years, or even leans in that direction, Chucko will have the advantage. Chucko's size, physical nature and two way ability will find him in the NHL at some point in some fashion. There are a lot of things that will weigh into the argument that people don't bother to look at, focusing instead on nothing but points.
I guess it depends on what type of player you are hoping for as well. Schremp reminds me of Marc Savard in a lot of ways. Chucko reminds me of Brendan Morrow. I prefer the guy that is gritty and contributes on both sides of the puck, but that is a personal preference. Big points don't impress me. Excuting your complete assignment impresses me. To date, Schremp reeks of Pavel Brendl. Big points, no committment to the game. If that's what floats your boat, you're all over Schremp. If you like guys that have grown as players you are likely more impressed by the job Chucko has done. But knowing these boards, points are the only guage that matters, so Schremp will win this in a landslide.