Proposal: Ridly Greig for a winger or RHD equivalent

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Greig is a good player, but I feel he's overshadowed at his strongest position which is playing as a Centre. Does anyone who needs a 3C that's cost-controlled and young while having a good middle 6 young cost-controlled winger or even a 2nd pairing cost-controlled RHD that they're willing to trade for Greig?

Click to read more...

 

[KevinRedkey]

Sens have Yakemchuk at RD coming soon, so trading Greig for a RHD seems a little short sighted IMO.

A LW could make some sense but it would need to be someone that is a good amount better that Greig is today, without being too old. A random example without aiming too high would be someone like Joel Farabee.

There's also the issue of cap space. The Sens basically have none, and Greig makes peanuts ATM.

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

Sens have Yakemchuk at RD coming soon, so trading Greig for a RHD seems a little short sighted IMO.

A LW could make some sense but it would need to be someone that is a good amount better that Greig is today, without being too old. A random example without aiming too high would be someone like Joel Farabee.

There's also the issue of cap space. The Sens basically have none, and Greig makes peanuts ATM.

I'd trade Greig for a young cost controlled LWer that's skilled without being soft.

 

[Hale The Villain]

I'd trade Greig for a young cost controlled LWer that's skilled without being soft.

That's literally Greig.

 

[Bjornar Moxnes]

That's literally Greig.

He's better suited for Centre.

 

[Hale The Villain]

He's better suited for Centre.

I don't think he is. I've always thought he projects more as a winger.

Still his ability to step in and play center is especially valuable to a team like the Sens. If Norris' shoulder gets re-injured we'll need Greig.

 

[The Devilish Buffoon]

No reason at all to trade Greig unless it's for a markedly better young player. Hard to think of a player on the trade market that would make much sense.

I'm comfortable with Greig playing any of the forward positions anyways.

 

[biturbo19]

Sens have Yakemchuk at RD coming soon, so trading Greig for a RHD seems a little short sighted IMO.

A LW could make some sense but it would need to be someone that is a good amount better that Greig is today, without being too old. A random example without aiming too high would be someone like Joel Farabee.

There's also the issue of cap space. The Sens basically have none, and Greig makes peanuts ATM.

Yeah. Between Zub and Yakemchuk coming, trading for a RD at this point is probably throwing a temporary patch on something that will hopefully work itself out eventually.

And as also mentioned above...it's entirely plausible that Norris continues to be an injury risk. Where having that extra guy who can play in the middle and slide up the lineup a bit, could be pretty huge. I think that's the more valuable position to maintain some depth at. Especially if it's young, cheap depth with versatility.

 

[MarkusKetterer]

I love Greig as a player, and wanted the Sabres to draft him back in his draft year.

Unfortunately the only thing the Sabres have potentially available is Jokiharju, who seems to be on the outs in Buffalo.

Of which the Sabres would have to add to make that trade.

 

[Pablo El Perro]

As an outsider, if the Sens are looking for a cost controlled 3rd liner, they should keep Greig. Of course, if a GM offers something ridiculous, trade him.

 

[Golden_Jet]

I'd trade Greig for a young cost controlled LWer that's skilled without being soft.

Lol, so someone like Greig who plays wing or centre.
Sens pass on the proposal.

 

[jbeck5]

What about Ridley Greig for Ridley Greig?

1 for 1.

I think this might be the best offer in the thread yet.

 

[Golden_Jet]

What about Ridley Greig for Ridley Greig?

1 for 1.

I think this might be the best offer in the thread yet.

I like that, as the original one is basically that.

 

[Lindberg Cheese]

What about Ridley Greig for Ridley Greig?

1 for 1.

I think this might be the best offer in the thread yet.

Senators add