Took a pill in Sbisa
2showToffoliIwascool
Hopefully the next step is replacing Milan Tichy as Director of European Amateur Scouting. There can't be anyone in hockey circles with a worse track record.
You are.Are you guys missing the point here? Or am I?
It doesn't matter one iota if Pracey is any good or not!
Savoie has only had one year pro.Possibly, granted since Wright joined the team he's had these picks in those 4 years:
3-1sts (numbers 14, 22, and 32 and one of them has already been traded in a trade yielding Ekholm)
1-2nd (drafted in 2023)
1-3rd (2021 draft)
2-4ths (2020, 2021)
3-5ths
5-6ths
4-7ths
Exactly 6 picks in the top 100 of any draft over a 4 year period. Players drafted outside the top 100 seldomly impact within 5-6 years. So we don't really know what to expect.
The only 5 picks he made in the top 100 still with the team are:
- Holloway who people seem to like,
- Bourgeault who still has a chance granted there were others in his range I'd rather have right now, -- Munzenburger who's a slow burn defenseman working his way through NCAA
- Carter Savoie (100th overall) who's had two years pro. Nothing special but not a complete right off yet.
- Beau Akey, way too early to tell.
He's also had some further back that are showing promise so far like Tullio, Wanner, and Petrov.
His record in Edmonton is a big pile of "yet TBD".
Except for Chaison the 2021 draft is gold.The amateur scouting here has been trash for a long, long time, this organization can't draft for shit unless they're getting gift wrapped a top 3 pick.
Not sure if Pracey is some big upgrade, but I guess Jackson did not like Wright.
Taking a wild guess and saying maybe Jackson isn't big on the Broberg, Holloway, Bourgault, etc. picks.
This makes it more likely that Holland is dead man walking as Wright was Holland's guy brought here from Detroit.
So you believe this about Talent not about establishing a timeline of change ...starting in a particular place.....and removing a smaller piece and progressively moving on to justifying an early Holland firing and replacement?You are.
Actually it does matter. Change for the sake of change is a nothing burger. Change for improvement is what you always strive for.
Gee really? I had no idea…You're aware that scouts have contracts and such until after drafts right?
The Oilers arent going into a draft with that position vacant.
Did you not read my post? It’s very clear what I stated in response to your earlier post. Not sure what your confused about.So you believe this about Talent not about establishing a timeline of change ...starting in a particular place.....and removing a smaller piece and progressively moving on to justifying a earyly Holland firing and replacement?
okayDid you not read my post? It’s very clear what I stated in response to your earlier post. Not sure what your confused about.
Rather than obfuscating the discussion with edits to your post after I’ve already responded, go back to your original post # 43…So you believe this about Talent not about establishing a timeline of change ...starting in a particular place.....and removing a smaller piece and progressively moving on to justifying an early Holland firing and replacement?
With the new GM bringing in his own Amateur scouting?
Why would the New Chief choose a new Amateur scout? Or do you think this was a move made in conjunction with Holland?
This is about Jeff slowly acquiring enough power to control the new GMs being brought in ....of course its about the power balance.
This is what I referred to When I said it does matter. Change “just because” isn’t strong leadership, nor do I think it’s what JJ is doing. He made the change with an eye towards improvement. Whether it happens will be evaluated and debated in the future.Are you guys missing the point here? Or am I?
It doesn't matter one iota if Pracey is any good or not!
I don't know if they talked about any other specific words. I just remember safe being referenced in a tweet.
I think the gist of it was prospects with some form of shooting and playmaking mentioned without any mention of intangibles had the highest chance to outproduce their draft status.
Rather than obfuscating the discussion with edits to your post after I’ve already responded, go back to your original post # 43…
This is what I referred to When I said it does matter. Change “just because” isn’t strong leadership, nor do I think it’s what JJ is doing. He made the change with an eye towards improvement. Whether it happens will be evaluated and debated in the future.
Anyway, I’ve read enough of your previous posts to know that it’s futile to have a discussion with you. I’m out on this one.
I think this is a fair and reasoned assessment. The Oilers have been opening their competitive window during the Wright era here. That's meant mid to later first round picks where the 'hit' likelihood drops substantively and longer development time is reality. There have been fewer picks as the organization has used some for deadline deals or help a move cap dump. There's been some movement to target undersized skill players with mid-draft picks on Tullio, Savoie along with a quality Russian CHL player in Petrov. Mining some decent mid-late round bets on Russian players. And an end of draft RD Warner who they signed essentially immediately. As well, Munzenberger is a national level d-man who wore a letter on his U20 team adjusting through slow cook North American play in NCAA. Add Akey this year who is a great skating right shot d with some latent potential as a puck mover and prospectively offence.Possibly, granted since Wright joined the team he's had these picks in those 4 years:
3-1sts (numbers 14, 22, and 32 and one of them has already been traded in a trade yielding Ekholm)
1-2nd (drafted in 2023)
1-3rd (2021 draft)
2-4ths (2020, 2021)
3-5ths
5-6ths
4-7ths
Exactly 6 picks in the top 100 of any draft over a 4 year period. Players drafted outside the top 100 seldomly impact within 5-6 years. So we don't really know what to expect.
The only 5 picks he made in the top 100 still with the team are:
- Holloway who people seem to like,
- Bourgeault who still has a chance granted there were others in his range I'd rather have right now, -- Munzenburger who's a slow burn defenseman working his way through NCAA
- Carter Savoie (100th overall) who's had two years pro. Nothing special but not a complete right off yet.
- Beau Akey, way too early to tell.
He's also had some further back that are showing promise so far like Tullio, Wanner, and Petrov.
His record in Edmonton is a big pile of "yet TBD".
I too need to use that site feature a bit more I see!Good riddance.
I’ve no idea who you’re responding to because of >Block< but I fully endorse your post.
We will see how it turns out but it doesn’t really look like a home run for Jackson if hes the one behind it.Change is good and this shows who is the real POHO, ie not holland.
Agreed. Ultimately we don’t know what happens behind the scenes. You could be a great scout but if the GM or Owner overrule you it doesn’t matter. But ultimately it just feels like this guy hasn’t been relevant for over a decade to me. Probably a harsh take and hopefully I am wrong but /shrug.I can’t help but be concerned about this. He’s got a pretty horrific track record. 2009 was obviously a massive win, but his only other NHLers in his 7 years in charge in Colorado were MacKinnon (1st overall) and Landeskog (2nd overall). His busts include Bleackley at 23, Siemens at 11, and Hishon at 17. And he was only a scout in Philly, but massive busts like Rubtsov and O’Brien don’t really help his case.
I was just agreeing with you. Though Pracey is likely short term and a place filler i guess it does matter as he will do alot of base work in his time for the next few months.Rather than obfuscating the discussion with edits to your post after I’ve already responded, go back to your original post # 43…
This is what I referred to When I said it does matter. Change “just because” isn’t strong leadership, nor do I think it’s what JJ is doing. He made the change with an eye towards improvement. Whether it happens will be evaluated and debated in the future.
Anyway, I’ve read enough of your previous posts to know that it’s futile to have a discussion with you. I’m out on this one.