Revisiting the Disastrous Kotkaniemi Offer Sheet By Carolina

WarriorofTime

Registered User
Jul 3, 2010
31,601
20,717
Yeah I didnt understand the Aho offer sheet, it was a good contract for Carolina, I’m surprised Aho even agreed to it.
From a cap standpoint, it was an obvious match. Aho hadn't even turned 22 yet and was coming off a 30 goal, PPG season. It was basically what Montreal would have given their own RFA in a similar circumstance. Only thing that I can think is they were really trying to stress test Carolina's financials with the frontloaded nature of the contract. Sort of a "lol, can this poverty-level franchise actually afford to pay half a total contract value within the first year of the deal?"

Obviously Carolina did match, and that is possibly where some of the pettiness and feud nature came from, since maybe Montreal does not offer such an offer sheet to a more known commodity wealthy franchise like Toronto, New York Rangers or Boston. Assuming finances were not really an issue, I think from a long-term cap management standpoint, they were most ticked off that the deal was 5 years, as they would probably would have liked to sign him to an 8-year deal and there was enough of a standstill with negotiations that he signed a 5-year deal to allow him to re-up during his UFA years with none getting "bought out" which is advantageous for the player.
 

NOTENOUGHRYJOTHINGS

Registered User
Oct 23, 2022
2,246
4,578
Habs fans so caught up in crackling with glee at the Kotkaniemi contract that they forget they had a third overall pick and whiffed so hard on KK that losing him for picks that were used to trade for Christian Dvorak is considered a win.

I haven't seen such a terrible use of a third overall pick since Galchenyuk.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,071
45,317
It’s aged horribly but IMO it’s underrated how bad of a move in the moment it was. They were in a go year and spent a first round pick and $6 million in space on their fourth line center. Like, why?
That’s the worst part and should be a fireable offence. That’s how you know the owner pushed for it. A team on the cusp of contending using a 1st and $6m in cap space on a player like that is just stupid.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,071
45,317
I think the Canes will try to offload him for a defenseman that's not a fit on their current team if they can, and only then look at the buyout route.
I highly doubt any team will want a player that ineffective on that long of a contract.
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,798
47,840
That’s the worst part and should be a fireable offence. That’s how you know the owner pushed for it. A team on the cusp of contending using a 1st and $6m in cap space on a player like that is just stupid.

Again, the belief was that KK was in need of a change of scenery and could find his game again with a new organization. Not an unheard of concept. And spending a low 1st on a 20-year-old former 3rd overall pick is exactly what contenders should be doing.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,071
45,317
Again, the belief was that KK was in need of a change of scenery and could find his game again with a new organization. Not an unheard of concept. And spending a low 1st on a 20-year-old former 3rd overall pick is exactly what contenders should be doing.
lol no it isn’t. Contenders shouldn’t be using that cap space and those assets on someone pencilled in as their 4C. They had Aho, Trocheck, Staal and even Stepan. It was a stupid move, no two ways about it.
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,798
47,840
lol no it isn’t. Contenders shouldn’t be using that cap space and those assets on someone pencilled in as their 4C. They had Aho, Trocheck, Staal and even Stepan. It was a stupid move, no two ways about it.

Trocheck had already informed the team he wouldn’t be resigning with them when they got KK. Which is probably a reason why they went after him, under the belief that (if he found his game), he could eventually fill in that hole. And if he didn’t, he would be Staal’s eventual replacement as the defensive 3rd line center.

If you really believe they made that deal expecting KK to be a fourth liner, give your head a shake.
 

x Tame Impala

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Aug 24, 2011
28,795
13,826
Habs fans so caught up in crackling with glee at the Kotkaniemi contract that they forget they had a third overall pick and whiffed so hard on KK that losing him for picks that were used to trade for Christian Dvorak is considered a win.

I haven't seen such a terrible use of a third overall pick since Galchenyuk.
Exactly. Habs fans are loving this meanwhile they wasted a tank year on a failed third overall pick. That’s a huge loss for a franchise.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,071
45,317
Trocheck had already informed the team he wouldn’t be resigning with them when they got KK. Which is probably a reason why they went after him, under the belief that (if he found his game), he could eventually fill in that hole. And if he didn’t, he would be Staal’s eventual replacement as the defensive 3rd line center.

If you really believe they made that deal expecting KK to be a fourth liner, give your head a shake.
They did exactly that for that season.

Even if they had long term aspirations, they sent an offersheet to a player that didn’t have a strong second half or a great playoff to show that he was at all developing. They acquired a kid who stagnated. He was the exact same player he was as a rookie.

It’s stupid. It handcuffed them for no reason during an excellent season ($6m in cap space at the deadline gets you two excellent players). And it was a player that showed little development and hadn’t shown any hidden potential to be uncovered.
 

elitepete

Registered User
Jan 30, 2017
8,183
5,520
Vancouver
Kotakniemi's playoff stats: 10 GP 0 G 1 A and had 27 points in the regular season this year all for $4,8M cap hit. Provided basically 0 offense in the playoffs.

Carolina let Vincent Trocheck go and rolled with KK. Trocheck now has 14 points, with 8 against his former team and a few huge points in the clincher.

The move to offer sheet KK started a chain of events that might have closed the Canes' contention window shut, and it all started as a petty PR troll job. This may be one of the most franchise damaging offer sheets we have seen.

Discuss.
Absolutely brain dead move
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,798
47,840
They did exactly that for that season.

Even if they had long term aspirations, they sent an offersheet to a player that didn’t have a strong second half or a great playoff to show that he was at all developing. They acquired a kid who stagnated. He was the exact same player he was as a rookie.

It’s stupid. It handcuffed them for no reason during an excellent season ($6m in cap space at the deadline gets you two excellent players). And it was a player that showed little development and hadn’t shown any hidden potential to be uncovered.

Again, it’s not unheard of for a player to stagnate in one organization and find new life in another.
 

le_sean

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
42,071
45,317
Again, it’s not unheard of for a player to stagnate in one organization and find new life in another.
Okay but wouldn’t you agree that a contending team should have used that space to help them that very season. Then in the offseason you reevaluate and use the cap space and those assets on someone that’s actually showed the ability to be a 2C, not a question mark.

The Habs are a team in a position to try players that “stagnate” (Dach, Newhook). It’s not the place of a contending team. I get being proactive, but this was being proactive at the detriment of your team.
 

Treb

Global Flanderator
May 31, 2011
29,762
30,589
Montreal
Yeah I didnt understand the Aho offer sheet, it was a good contract for Carolina, I’m surprised Aho even agreed to it.

Option 1: Carolina wasn't willing to give him that much money before the OF ultimatum.
Option 2: He wanted a shorter/longer contract (to get UFA negotiation rights on his new contract) than Carolina was willing to offer.
Option 3: He wanted more early instant money than CAR wanted to offer (front-loaded signing bonus contract).
Option 4: He wanted out.

Whatever of option 1,2 or 3 it was, we'll likely never know. All we know is that it wasn't option 4 based on him re-signing, unless his opinion changed between 2019 and 2023.

TL;DR Salary, length or money structure

EDIT: Added another option
 

TheMoreYouKnow

Registered User
May 3, 2007
16,962
3,941
38° N 77° W
Of course it was a bad move. Offer sheets are basically bad moves by design because the league wants to discourage it. They're only ever defensible if the player is 'the guy' you are 100% sure about and definitely want. They aren't meant for taking flyers on guys that could use a change of scenery to jump start their development.
 

Blueline Bomber

AI Generated Minnesota Wild
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2007
40,798
47,840
Okay but wouldn’t you agree that a contending team should have used that space to help them that very season. Then in the offseason you reevaluate and use the cap space and those assets on someone that’s actually showed the ability to be a 2C, not a question mark.

The Habs are a team in a position to try players that “stagnate” (Dach, Newhook). It’s not the place of a contending team. I get being proactive, but this was being proactive at the detriment of your team.

The season they made the offer sheet, they weren’t going for it all. Obviously, they’d like to win the Cup. Every playoff team would. But they were still in the “Hey, we ended a long drought and are happy to make the playoffs” phase of building a contender. Every Canes fan knew this would be the year they’d make a real push. We all saw the ends of a lot of contracts lining up and knew it’d be the last hurrah for this group of players.

So (I assume) the hope was that we’d get a clear answer on where KK lies sometime between the start of the 2021 season and the end the of 2023 season. And it seemed like we did at the end of the 2022 one, when he signed his new deal. He had put up good numbers (43 in 82) and was solid defensively. And this year started out great for him, but quickly turned sour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tryamw

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad