#1 -- you going where you went is contrary to how I framed it, obv
I did not say there was automatically a problem, and if there was, that JT had to go.
There was a published report that more than insinuated and solidly inferred it might be due to JTm - EP having a conflict. Most did not say this was certainly true, and proceeded, as i did, with IF IF IF it were true, what does that mean.
You properly chimed in with your understanding, to extent you are personally aware, is the publ report is wrong.
That very well may be. Clickbait happens.
I am unaware either way.
But as long as it does not misrepresent something possible for something actual, nobody has to get their privates in an uproar.
Relax.
Unless a guy is a known scumbag who slewfoots, etc., I am behind proper position is to hope whatever is bothering a player, that they can overcome it and get back to being focused on hockey. Same here w/JT.
2. Players issues' impact value: zib now is not the same zib a yr, even months ago, and it seems to be mental funk -> snakebit, and not physical.
JT needing personal time is a thing. It may be a small thing, or like Zib, it may turn into a big thing. Remains to be seen.
3. We all speculate about deals, and do so under actual/perceived conditions. Some agree, others challenge. That is healthy debate.
To your good health, my friend. And those of players on teams we love.
4. We are not Rags. Rangers, nyr for abbreviation, or Rs for short.
But not Rags.
thank you
