Toggle sidebar

RD Zayne Parekh - Saginaw Spirit, OHL (2024, 9th, CGY)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
pman25 said:
I’d also curious about the sharks approach if they end up with say pick 2 and pick 11 or something. Take the highest upside play possible at 2 (Demidov/Parekh?) and snag whoever slides at 11? I could see that playing out too
Click to expand...

majormajor said:
If I'm picking 2 & 11 as the Sharks I take Demidov at 2 and then you're still going to get a good faller at #11. Could be Yakemchuk (I think a bit unlikely), or maybe Parekh or Buium.
Click to expand...
Speaking only as a Sharks fan trying to figure out what Grier will do, I don't think there's any chance he takes Parekh over pretty much any other top 6 D. The old regime might have considered this but Grier is all about "bigger, faster, hard to play against" and In RD alone, let alone LD, Lev and Yak are closer to the type of player he's been adding and targeting.

If we do get the Pens pick, I would wager that Grier picks 2 D and completely transforms our D pipeline. Any two of those top D would immediately be our top D prospects over Mukhamadullin.

I even think Demidov as a skill winger who is not big, is unlikely for the Sharks over Lev, Silayev, Dickinson, or perhaps even Yak or Buium.

I could be wrong!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Makoshark, Kaners PPGs and Bye Bye Blueston
coooldude said:
I even think Demidov as a skill winger who is not big, is unlikely for the Sharks over Lev, Silayev, Dickinson, or perhaps even Yak or Buium.

I could be wrong!
Click to expand...

Personally I think of Demidov as a nasty hard to play against type of player. 5'11, very strong on his edges, and will hit to hurt. He can forecheck too.
 
From the snippets I have seen of him, I share your opinion that he should be able to at least play „ok“ Defence and that the offensive upside is worth taking that bet. Right now, his D looks exactly like the D EK65 played while with the Sharks. That was far from great, but because EK was excellent in exciting the D zone with possession and entering the O zone with possession, those deficits - while they made him look bad on a lot of highlight tapes - were far outweighed by the other aspects. Not saying Parekh is EK offensively, but his o-toolkit really is something else.

Have heard some Merkley comparisons, and while I see the similaritys, the comp doesn’t add up. Merkley failed cause he processed the game at a very slow speed. That worked in Juniors but as I couldn’t speed his decision-making up, it failed in the NHL. No such problem with Parekh.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bounces R Way, Mattb124, wetcoast and 2 others
I though luca cagnoni was impressive on the power play last year, but parekh blows him out of the water. Parekh is also bigger and has some nice attributes. He takes over games and is really good at 5v5 offense too. He is an incredible asset to have. I do have to say, with all the comments about him being an exceptional skater, he isn’t all that explosive. Pretty average first step, and the top speed is a little above average.

I’ve seen some real progress in his defensive game this year. He gives plenty of effort covering guys and is always trying to do whats best for the team
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bounces R Way, Hockeyville USA, slumpy43 and 3 others
CaptainShark said:
From the snippets I have seen of him, I share your opinion that he should be able to at least play „ok“ Defence and that the offensive upside is worth taking that bet. Right now, his D looks exactly like the D EK65 played while with the Sharks. That was far from great, but because EK was excellent in exciting the D zone with possession and entering the O zone with possession, those deficits - while they made him look bad on a lot of highlight tapes - were far outweighed by the other aspects. Not saying Parekh is EK offensively, but his o-toolkit really is something else.

Have heard some Merkley comparisons, and while I see the similaritys, the comp doesn’t add up. Merkley failed cause he processed the game at a very slow speed. That worked in Juniors but as I couldn’t speed his decision-making up, it failed in the NHL. No such problem with Parekh.
Click to expand...
Parekh has an elite processor.. His decision making and passing skill are also top of the class. He processes the game very much like EK imo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HarrySPlinkett, Hockeyville USA, Bye Bye Blueston and 1 other person
CaptainShark said:
From the snippets I have seen of him, I share your opinion that he should be able to at least play „ok“ Defence and that the offensive upside is worth taking that bet. Right now, his D looks exactly like the D EK65 played while with the Sharks. That was far from great, but because EK was excellent in exciting the D zone with possession and entering the O zone with possession, those deficits - while they made him look bad on a lot of highlight tapes - were far outweighed by the other aspects. Not saying Parekh is EK offensively, but his o-toolkit really is something else.

Have heard some Merkley comparisons, and while I see the similaritys, the comp doesn’t add up. Merkley failed cause he processed the game at a very slow speed. That worked in Juniors but as I couldn’t speed his decision-making up, it failed in the NHL. No such problem with Parekh.
Click to expand...
Hard agree here. I’m not extremely high on Parekh or anything but the Ryan Merkley comparisons are out to lunch. Merkley has fantastic vision but no concept of when to use it. He’d just be stuck in decision paralysis until the defender was on him and pressured him into turning the puck over. I see nothing like that with Parekh. Everything Parekh does is quick, crisp, and intentional. He absolutely has NHL pace and NHL-caliber hockey IQ, unlike Merkley.

Whether Parekh pans out remains to be seen, but I also contend that his defense is not the worst amongst highly-touted draft eligible junior defenseman this season—that honor goes to Yakemchuk. Parekh definitely makes some defensive plays that make me cringe, but he is also capable of solid defensive plays and I think capable of becoming more consistent defensively. He’ll never be a stalwart, but I think he can get to “NHL-worthy”.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HarrySPlinkett, DatsyukToZetterberg, Kcoyote3 and 5 others
Juxtaposer said:
Hard agree here. I’m not extremely high on Parekh or anything but the Ryan Merkley comparisons are out to lunch. Merkley has fantastic vision but no concept of when to use it. He’d just be stuck in decision paralysis until the defender was on him and pressured him into turning the puck over. I see nothing like that with Parekh. Everything Parekh does is quick, crisp, and intentional. He absolutely has NHL pace and NHL-caliber hockey IQ, unlike Merkley.

Whether Parekh pans out remains to be seen, but I also contend that his defense is not the worst amongst highly-touted draft eligible junior defenseman this season—that honor goes to Yakemchuk. Parekh definitely makes some defensive plays that make me cringe, but he is also capable of solid defensive plays and I think capable of becoming more consistent defensively. He’ll never be a stalwart, but I think he can get to “NHL-worthy”.
Click to expand...
Merkley also never progressed after his DY. His production plateaued (relative to how it should have grown) and he didn't round out his game
 
rt said:
You personally know Zayne Parekh?
Click to expand...
No, when did I ever say I did?

I know that someone who spits on an opponent, and has had the reputation of being overtly cocky isn’t the opposite of a head case though. That’s for sure.
 
rt said:
Can you support that claim?
Click to expand...
Horrible person. I heard he cured cancer and has yet to tell anyone how to do it. One time he donated $5,000.00 to a dog shelter to provide for more housing, then immediately cancelled the donation right after they transferred in more dogs. It was euthanization hell. Too many red flags for a team to take him with their 1st pick. It's almost like he should get drafted by a team that has 2 first round picks and a sketchy recent past.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SquidNasty, Dominance and EddieTheEagle
rt said:
Can you support that claim?
Click to expand...
I’m providing information, whether you believe it or not is subject to your own opinion/the narrative you’re trying to push.

It isn’t the first, and it isn’t going to be the last time this is brought up in this thread.
 
Castle8130 said:
Horrible person. I heard he cured cancer and has yet to tell anyone how to do it. One time he donated $5,000.00 to a dog shelter to provide for more housing, then immediately cancelled the donation right after they transferred in more dogs. It was euthanization hell. Too many red flags for a team to take him with their 1st pick. It's almost like he should get drafted by a team that has 2 first round picks and a sketchy recent past.
Click to expand...
And these were the repercussions :

 
  • Like
Reactions: Castle8130
rt said:
Which of us is pushing a narrative? You made the claim. Are you willing to support your claim?
Click to expand...
I don’t need to. Just know, NHL teams know all about his character and I wouldn’t at all be surprised if some don’t want anything to do with him.

I mean, don’t know why you’re so surprised by this information. You don’t spit on another player (which is straight up assault) without being cocky and thinking you’re untouchable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Gr8 Dane
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom