RD Victor Soderstrom (2019, 11th, ARZ)

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
59,840
26,532
New York
Not sure what you've been watching. Söderström has played pretty well so far.

You know what happens with these these tournaments. People who don’t watch these players during the season make big sweeping assessments on these players ability based on their play in a two week tournament.
 

Guardian452

Registered User
Jun 10, 2011
1,311
355
I want no part of him at 10 for Canucks. We need more than a solid defenceman. Too many good forwards in the top 10 to help our anemic scoring.

Offense starts with a solid D core.

You can build a team using the Edmonton model - load up on scoring forwards - and windup with a team who still can't score because they lack blue-liners who can move the puck out of their own zone. Or you can build a team using the Carolina model - load up on the back-end - and have a team that's dangerous offensive because you have 3-4 solid defencemen who can lead the rush up the ice and enter the offensive zone with possession. Right now the Canucks have one defenseman who can move the puck and generate any offense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Plub

Nabrules

Registered User
Nov 5, 2018
1,598
1,668
Offense starts with a solid D core.

You can build a team using the Edmonton model - load up on scoring forwards - and windup with a team who still can't score because they lack blue-liners who can move the puck out of their own zone. Or you can build a team using the Carolina model - load up on the back-end - and have a team that's dangerous offensive because you have 3-4 solid defencemen who can lead the rush up the ice and enter the offensive zone with possession. Right now the Canucks have one defenseman who can move the puck and generate any offense.

All goes back to always pick the bpa with your first rounder. If you think Soderstrom is the bpa then by all means go pick him but most Canucks fans only seem to want him because he’s right handed. Imo the forwards Canucks could potentially get at 10 have a higher upside and project to have a higher impact than Söderström
 

Snowpants

In Depth Hockey Analyst
Apr 20, 2019
1,161
1,188
Think he will be a top pairing guy. If he finds the offense a Karlsson lite but otherwise I like the Ekholm Lindholm comparisons couple pages back. Tournament might hurt him but will be some other smart team's gain.
 

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
Sponsor
May 25, 2014
46,378
32,177
Offense starts with a solid D core.

You can build a team using the Edmonton model - load up on scoring forwards - and windup with a team who still can't score because they lack blue-liners who can move the puck out of their own zone. Or you can build a team using the Carolina model - load up on the back-end - and have a team that's dangerous offensive because you have 3-4 solid defencemen who can lead the rush up the ice and enter the offensive zone with possession. Right now the Canucks have one defenseman who can move the puck and generate any offense.
Not a huge difference as i see your point, but we also have Hughes now, so theres 2
 

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
79,226
87,004
Nova Scotia
Philly defs needs more difference making forward than D
But do they really get a different difference maker at 11?

Giroux Couturier Voracek
JVR Patrick Koneny
Lindblom Frost Farabee

Ratcliffe, Vorobyev, Allison, Laczynski, O'Brien, Rubstov, Kase, etc...
 

wings5

Registered User
Jan 6, 2008
7,443
933
But do they really get a different difference maker at 11?

Giroux Couturier Voracek
JVR Patrick Koneny
Lindblom Frost Farabee

Ratcliffe, Vorobyev, Allison, Laczynski, O'Brien, Rubstov, Kase, etc...

For sure, some good forward is going to slip might be Podkolzin, Dach , Newhook, Zegras, Boldy, all have great potential.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nabrules

M2Beezy

Objective and Neutral Hockey Commentator
Sponsor
May 25, 2014
46,378
32,177
Hope the Canucks avoid him, seems injury prone
 

Canadian Canuck

Hughes4Calder
Jul 30, 2013
14,226
3,973
Kamloops BC
Offense starts with a solid D core.

You can build a team using the Edmonton model - load up on scoring forwards - and windup with a team who still can't score because they lack blue-liners who can move the puck out of their own zone. Or you can build a team using the Carolina model - load up on the back-end - and have a team that's dangerous offensive because you have 3-4 solid defencemen who can lead the rush up the ice and enter the offensive zone with possession. Right now the Canucks have one defenseman who can move the puck and generate any offense.
Hughes
Stetcher
Edler
Juolevi
Hutton

All good at moving the puck up ice. You take BPA. Simple. And at 10 that will be a forward.
 

ulvvf

Registered User
May 9, 2014
2,744
150
Offense starts with a solid D core.

You can build a team using the Edmonton model - load up on scoring forwards - and windup with a team who still can't score because they lack blue-liners who can move the puck out of their own zone. Or you can build a team using the Carolina model - load up on the back-end - and have a team that's dangerous offensive because you have 3-4 solid defencemen who can lead the rush up the ice and enter the offensive zone with possession. Right now the Canucks have one defenseman who can move the puck and generate any offense.

Edmonton traded their only elite winger for a solid D, work out great.

Nashville has had 4 1d for a couple of years, where is their cup?

D is extremly overrated
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad