Bonin21
Registered User
- May 1, 2014
- 2,717
- 1,585
Good lord, he's a freshman. Give him two more years and you don't think he'll learn?That is kind of scary because he is going to get exposed a lot more at NHL level
Good lord, he's a freshman. Give him two more years and you don't think he'll learn?That is kind of scary because he is going to get exposed a lot more at NHL level
It is also the easiest to fix of the issues he has.That is kind of scary because he is going to get exposed a lot more at NHL level
I don’t agree at all that he plays a more junior style game. That wreaks of stat watching. When Wisconsin played Denver, Buium was not super noticeable at even strength (good or bad). He made the right plays and had good gaps/solid defensive positioning. Not overpowering but also not weak. Didn’t cheat into the offensive zone or make dumb pinches. His game looked way more pro ready than Hensler’s game. Unless you mean that Zeev is more top 4 or bust whereas Hensler could stick in the NHL as a 6/7 tweener? I guess I don’t follow what you are saying.I would say the big difference is that Buium has a flashier and more junior style game that gets him more fans and succeeds more outside of pro hockey, but Hensler has similar (probably a little less, but relative to his ceiling a higher floor) potential.
Buium is a star in college hockey (and when he's played junior tournaments).I don’t agree at all that he plays a more junior style game. That wreaks of stat watching. When Wisconsin played Denver, Buium was not super noticeable at even strength (good or bad). He made the right plays and had good gaps/solid defensive positioning. Not overpowering but also not weak. Didn’t cheat into the offensive zone or make dumb pinches. His game looked way more pro ready than Hensler’s game. Unless you mean that Zeev is more top 4 or bust whereas Hensler could stick in the NHL as a 6/7 tweener? I guess I don’t follow what you are saying.
He is a first line partner to Brock Faber for 10 years...Buium is a star in college hockey (and when he's played junior tournaments).
But what is he when he gets to the NHL? Is he a star 1D who is good at every part of the game? Or is he a slightly flawed 2D who has some major strengths, but also some weaknesses? Is that much better than a lower event player such as Hensler who will be a 3D? Hypothetically speaking, of course.
Buium will probably be a 2D next to Faber. Hensler is a long shot to be a 3D, which is my initial problem with your analogy.Buium is a star in college hockey (and when he's played junior tournaments).
But what is he when he gets to the NHL? Is he a star 1D who is good at every part of the game? Or is he a slightly flawed 2D who has some major strengths, but also some weaknesses? Is that much better than a lower event player such as Hensler who will be a 3D? Hypothetically speaking, of course.
Great work buddy. Love your passion for the game.OK @DigitalBoldy, so to recap Hensler's 2/23 game against Notre Dame (a 6-1 loss):
-Hensler had 28 shifts and nearly all were 5v5 or 4v4 (none on PK, few on PP2)
-He completed 21-of-21 passes (short & long) without a single turnover
-He was 5-for-5 on exits with his skating and 3-for-3 on entries, but one later resulted in a turnover and clear.
-He was partly responsible for one goal scored (3-1) and one goal against (4-1), and directly responsible for one goal against (5-1).
-The penalty he was called for was entirely his partner's fault, as was the 3-0 goal against.
-He exhibited solid dzone or man coverage 17 times and blew coverage twice.
-He showed good gap control nine times and poor gap control twice.
-He made 14 high-IQ decisions with or without the puck versus four low-IQ plays.
To summarize, Hensler was Wisconsin's best defender in a game they had no business winning and were mostly lifeless on offense. His partner Palodichuk was the worst, but he was coming off an injury and was likely rusty. The Badger forwards outside of Quinn Finley were almost entirely ineffective at generating quality chances.
Any NHL scout worth his salt would not deduce Hensler had a bad game unless he was drunk, on his phone, or had an axe to grind.
I mean, you can say things like this but Hensler could 100% not get smoked by the ND player right here:-The penalty he was called for was entirely his partner's fault, as was the 3-0 goal against.
Weren’t you just in the Hutson thread talking about how his shutdown work at the WJC foreshadowed his versatility as an NHLer? Buium has virtually the exact resume, just with more points and more championships.Buium is a star in college hockey (and when he's played junior tournaments).
But what is he when he gets to the NHL? Is he a star 1D who is good at every part of the game? Or is he a slightly flawed 2D who has some major strengths, but also some weaknesses? Is that much better than a lower event player such as Hensler who will be a 3D? Hypothetically speaking, of course.
I mean, you can say things like this but Hensler could 100% not get smoked by the ND player right here:
View attachment 984487
He coasted for 1-2 seconds in the neutral zone then went “oh shit that ND player went flying past me!”
It’s just built into your bias that nothing is Hensler’s fault.
Great work buddy. Love your passion for the game.
You gloss over so many details. I just know for future reference not to listen to your takes.My advice is to pay better attention when you're at the game, or at least watch the replay before you shoot your mouth off.
You gloss over so many details. I just know for future reference not to listen to your takes.
But hey, props to you for liking the guy who plays just as terribly as the rest of the badger d core. I guess that makes him a 1st round quality player in your eyes. I wouldn’t make that argument for a player. I would feel stupid in doing so. None of the rest of the badger defense is anywhere close to 1st round quality. But hey, he plays exactly the same as them!!!
You said Hensler did nothing wrong on a negative play he clearly participated in. I haven’t had the time to dive into the rest of your post, but I’m sure there is plenty more to correct.LOL!
I do appreciate that, before you could even get into the game, you managed to get the date the hockey game was played on INCORRECT. Off to a great startHere’s a shift-by-shift of Hensler’s last game. I’ll do it in increments:
vs Notre Dame (2/23/25)
A "clean outlet pass" you say? You mean a play he read a second late and passes behind Fitzgerald (#13)?? Fitzgerald literally had to stop to catch his pass.-@0:23 — paired with #14 Palodichuk and makes clean outlet pass from inside his own end but #13 turned it over in the NZ — then had to engage in a wall battle and made a second breakout pass for an exit and change
Time is actually ~2:20 into the 1st period when Hensler jumps on the ice.-@2:00 — Hustles off bench to man right point but has to vacate to assist Palodichuk in one-on-one. Fishes puck free in front of net and escapes behind net to rim up the wall. Puck squirts back behind the net, where Hensler hustles to collect and took hard hit behind net to deliver clean breakout pass
Didn't do anything crazy here. Yes, he had his stick forward, but the offsides was more due to the ND forward in front of the puck carrier not having awareness of the blue line and puck location (and the ND forward fanned on the pass into the zone towards the boards).-@4:04 — Play starts in offensive end but Irish eventually countered 3-on-3, which Hensler challenged with stick on puck at the line to help force an offside (finished his check after the whistle but refs stepped in)
Factually correct. Nice job!-@5:18 — Joins play in offensive zone but puck is chipped out. Palodichuk hands it off to Hensler on the backskate and fires a diagonal pass from inside his blue line to center wall where #28 Adam Pietila sweeps it in. Notre Dame then ices it.
Already discussed this one. Palodichuk takes over 50% of the blame. He spun the wrong direction to make a play on the puck (if he goes to his right it's a 90 degree turn, left is a 270 degree turn-@5:40 - Off the draw, Notre Dame clears it off the near boards and Palodichuk takes the wrong route to the puck that allows Cole Knuble to explode down the middle for a partial break-in that forces Hensler into a hooking penalty. Hensler was a step behind Knuble who had the initial burst in what was a bang-bang play.
If Hensler is good defensively then we need to ask ourselves why he doesn't kill penalties. Dexheimer was out on this PK and he sucks defensively. Phelan was out there too (20 y/o 3rd pairing player).-@8:41 - Badgers back to PK as Weston Knox steps up and drills someone at ND blue line for interference call (Hensler doesn’t kill penalties). PP negated by Notre Dame TMM - so 4-on-4 for 34 seconds
Good shift for him. Defended the 1-on-1 well and then was abandoned by his teammates for a couple seconds (like wtf are Finley/Dyck doing here...) but held up well.-@10:07 - Offensive-zone draw for Palodichuk-Kehrer - then UW to the PP with Dexheimer — Hensler jumps on at 11:20 and has to defend a 1-on-1 after Finley dzone turnover. Hensler forces Janicke wide with stick on puck, then switches quickly to cover Knuble behind net and force turnover and exit. Puck is cleared and Hensler collects puck for bullet pass to streaking Fitzgerald before changing