RD Logan Hensler - USNTDP, USHL (2025 Draft)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
This thread has been pretty quiet for a potential top-10 pick, or at least the second or third defenseman off the board come June. Wisconsin has been quite the interesting team this year thanks to the injuries and freshmen, but I get the sense most people have no clue how he’s doing, to include those who cover the draft. I still think scouts like his projection. Put him in the CHL and he’s on the top pairing playing 23+ a
He’s been falling a lot from scouts that watch these kids a lot . Lot of people have him 20-30 range now .
 
  • Like
Reactions: WeThreeKings
Anyway, Hensler was pretty good last night as Wisconsin snapped its winless streak in a win over Notre Dame. Gap was tight and finished his checks with authority. Earned a primary by dropping down around the net and finding Melenbacher in the slot. He looks like a pro defenseman despite being a freshman on a young and banged-up team in the nation’s toughest conference.
 
Solid reasoning. He shouldn't go top 15 because he shouldn't.
He wasn’t great at world juniors and he’s having an average but solid year at wisconsin . He doesn’t do anything really good and he projects as bottom pair dmen - that sound like a top 10 pick lol . Outside Schaefer the dmen in the class from what i watched and scouts that i listen too think it’s a weak class . I think he goes 17-24 probably which is great but I don’t see top 10 pick and I think he’s 4 -5 th dmen taken .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Patty Ice
He wasn’t great at world juniors and he’s having an average but solid year at wisconsin . He doesn’t do anything really good and he projects as bottom pair dmen - that sound like a top 10 pick lol . Outside Schaefer the dmen in the class from what i watched and scouts that i listen too think it’s a weak class . I think he goes 17-24 probably which is great but I don’t see top 10 pick and I think he’s 4 -5 th dmen taken .

Much more reasonable. I tend to agree that he's likely not going to be a top 10 pick, I do think you are selling him short. I think he is handling himself very well as a freshman and with this weak class plus the fact that he is a righty, I don't see him falling out of the teens (even though I would love it if he was around the Stars pick). I think he has the makings of a very solid if unspectacular top 4 damn that would fit very well with the group the Sharks have collected this far.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pavel Buchnevich
Much more reasonable. I tend to agree that he's likely not going to be a top 10 pick, I do think you are selling him short. I think he is handling himself very well as a freshman and with this weak class plus the fact that he is a righty, I don't see him falling out of the teens (even though I would love it if he was around the Stars pick). I think he has the makings of a very solid if unspectacular top 4 damn that would fit very well with the group the Sharks have collected this far.
Upside be a righty Slavin?
 
Upside be a righty Slavin?

I'd use another (former) Canes defenseman Brett Pesce as a comp as far as what his offensive production might look like and being a righty.

Nothing flashy but damn solid. A top 4 guy on a contender in his prime.

My wish is for Grier to sucker some GM drafting in the teens to take the Stars pick and the Sharks second so they can pick him up.
 
Last edited:
This thread has been pretty quiet for a potential top-10 pick, or at least the second or third defenseman off the board come June. Wisconsin has been quite the interesting team this year thanks to the injuries and freshmen, but I get the sense most people have no clue how he’s doing, to include those who cover the draft. I still think scouts like his projection. Put him in the CHL and he’s on the top pairing playing 23+ a game.
Hi, Wisconsin season ticket holder here. Here are my thoughts on Hensler:

Hensler’s skill set and size are quality traits towards an NHL projection. Hockey IQ leaves a lot to be desired. There are a ton of chances against/goals against this year that can be traced back to a decision he made in the offensive zone and neutral zone. He will often try to make the hero play instead of using his teammates as well.

Playing 18 minutes a night in D1 NCAA is better than 23 minutes a night in the CHL.
 
Hi, Wisconsin season ticket holder here. Here are my thoughts on Hensler:

Hensler’s skill set and size are quality traits towards an NHL projection. Hockey IQ leaves a lot to be desired. There are a ton of chances against/goals against this year that can be traced back to a decision he made in the offensive zone and neutral zone. He will often try to make the hero play instead of using his teammates as well.

Playing 18 minutes a night in D1 NCAA is better than 23 minutes a night in the CHL.
Thx for the update since you see him more than anybody !
 
Logan Hensler is the most boring 6-20 range prospect ever. He’ll go somewhere in that range. He’ll be like an NHL 3 or 4. People work themselves up about him way too much. The thread isn’t lively because he’s not exciting.
 
Hi, Wisconsin season ticket holder here. Here are my thoughts on Hensler:

Hensler’s skill set and size are quality traits towards an NHL projection. Hockey IQ leaves a lot to be desired. There are a ton of chances against/goals against this year that can be traced back to a decision he made in the offensive zone and neutral zone. He will often try to make the hero play instead of using his teammates as well.

Playing 18 minutes a night in D1 NCAA is better than 23 minutes a night in the CHL.

The bolded can be said about Dexheimer and Palodichuk as well. If you recall, Hensler was more reserved when paired with Laatsch, who got hurt and forced Hastings to mess with his pairings.

Hastings said on his radio spot that he was counting on Hensler to be more aggressive, which explains why 10 of his 12 points have come in the last 18 games. Then he paired him Dexheimer which made sense offensively but led to plenty of odd-man rushes. Seems like the coach is the one putting pressure on Hensler to create since the blue line is green. Hastings has even had to use a forward on defense because of the injuries (think it was Hornach and someone else).

I don’t think it’s an IQ problem at all and I definitely don’t see his turnovers coming in bunches. Saying “a ton” is a stretch. Werenski, the Hughes brothers and Levshunov were turnover machines in their draft years, way more than Hensler’s been.

If you need specific examples, I’m talking about the Michigan games after the WJC, the Gopher series in Mariucci, and last night against ND.

Besides, Hastings has always been a coach who pushes his dmen. It’s an up-tempo system and Hensler has looked good all things considered.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wheatens
Logan Hensler is the most boring 6-20 range prospect ever. He’ll go somewhere in that range. He’ll be like an NHL 3 or 4. People work themselves up about him way too much. The thread isn’t lively because he’s not exciting.

It’s a shitty year for defensemen. But he’s been more involved on offense the last few weeks. He was more vanilla in the first half, but he was new to the NCAA. Hanifin was boring as well early at BC but produced in the second half. Youngest defender on a top-heavy team in the toughest conference in the nation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wheatens
"Vanilla 6'2" right-handed NCAA defenseman who was solid at the WJC" is an archetype that will get drafted top-15 comfortably IMO. If he was a lefty, he might fall into the second round.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad