OilersFanatics505
Registered User
- Aug 11, 2008
- 5,546
- 5,287
Nice hindsight 20/20 vision you used there.That's correct, they aren't comparable players. Anyone who has watched both players will agree
Nice hindsight 20/20 vision you used there.That's correct, they aren't comparable players. Anyone who has watched both players will agree
Two ~6' 185lb offensively inclined right shot defenseman drafted in the 3rd round who saw their production explode in their D+1 season aren't comparable players in any way?
I just don't see that being the case. They even had/have similar warts at this stage in their respective careers. I don't think you lead a major junior league by such a margin in assists as a dman without having your hockey IQ be an asset either.
Yeah I mean, there's very few players even in the NHL that don't have a flaw or two. I just don't think Brzustewicz is quite the boom/bust prospect this thread is characterizing him as. He doesn't need to be Adam Fox to be an impact player at the highest level. Good defenseman in this league can 1) avoid the forecheck, 2) move the puck effectively in every zone, 3) break up the cycle.
From what I've watched of him there's no fatal flaws that would make him unable to do those three things.
That's correct, they aren't comparable players. Anyone who has watched both players will agree
I mean, just watch them. They're completely different players. Fox was also much better defensively and offensively.Seems like a very narrow definition of comparable to me but to each their own.
No hindsight. I was high on Fox well before he became a Norris winner. These two players are not comparable.Nice hindsight 20/20 vision you used there.
That's correct, they aren't comparable players. Anyone who has watched both players will agree
I mean, just watch them. They're completely different players. Fox was also much better defensively and offensively.
No hindsight. I was high on Fox well before he became a Norris winner. These two players are not comparable.
It's hilarious that's even a controversial statement.
FWIW the comparison that was mostly used on the Canucks board was Rasmus Sandin. Similiar strengths and weaknesses. Like it's been stated before, many Canucks fans where not too high on him, just because of his weaknesses. You don't see too many elite defensemen who posses his weaknesses (skating, muffin shot, average defender). This isn't even Canucks fans hating. He was a very polarizing prospect on our board. You had fans who loved him, but just as many who wanted to sell high.
Best of luck with him.
There is still a subset of fans, scouts, and executives that want big strong guys willing to use the stick as a weapon to clear the front of the net, puck movement be damned. If they will fight so much the better. The things you mention are all things that require smarts and the ability to bring it bear quickly but for some people that is a skill they cannot really measure so they default to size strength and meanness. You have watched HB a lot more than I have and I don't doubt your thoughts on him. Ultimately, I'm just glad the game has changed enough that someone 6 foot even or less and below 200 pounds can get a fair shot and a team will actually invest in their development. There is a path to the NHL for HB and that is all anyone can ask for right now. The rest will be up to him but as you've noted, he's got the basic tools and seems to have tremendous skill to create offense so he's got a good shot if it translates. Why anyone would rather watch a bigger slower guy clutch and grab and cross check rather than a skilled guy play is beyond me but to each their own.Two ~6' 185lb offensively inclined right shot defenseman drafted in the 3rd round who saw their production explode in their D+1 season aren't comparable players in any way?
I just don't see that being the case. They even had/have similar warts at this stage in their respective careers. I don't think you lead a major junior league by such a margin in assists as a dman without having your hockey IQ be an asset either.
Yeah I mean, there's very few players even in the NHL that don't have a flaw or two. I just don't think Brzustewicz is quite the boom/bust prospect this thread is characterizing him as. He doesn't need to be Adam Fox to be an impact player at the highest level. Good defenseman in this league can 1) avoid the forecheck, 2) move the puck effectively in every zone, 3) break up the cycle.
From what I've watched of him there's no fatal flaws that would make him unable to do those three things.
There is always more than one way to skin the cat (who came up with that saying it's really pretty gruesome when you think about it. Who skins cats and has done it enough to determine there are multiple ways of doing it efficiently? What is wrong with people). For some, the basic version of how they play can tell them enough, some are more nuanced. I think you and the poster you are having the disagreement with are both making good points about the player as someone who has only watched him play a couple of times and the little I read about him when he first hit my radar screen was that he was trending towards being closer to a first round pick. I think in general comparisons with players like an Adam Fox or a Quinn Hughes are unfair. That's an exceptional outcome and I'd like to think a guy like Seamus Casey can make the NHL without having to play at a Norris trophy level. I get your point and I don't doubt there are differences in skills and style but if they both more or less arrive at the same end I can see how someone would see it differently.I mean, just watch them. They're completely different players. Fox was also much better defensively and offensively.
No hindsight. I was high on Fox well before he became a Norris winner. These two players are not comparable.
It's hilarious that's even a controversial statement.
It is fascinating watching this guy's stock skyrocket in the eyes of some fans now that he's been traded.
Vancouver fans were annoyed he wasn't even invited to the US WJC camp and the thread was chalk full of people telling us he's a dime-a-dozen small OFD that wouldn't improve the team. Now he's apparently going to be Adam Fox
It is fascinating watching this guy's stock skyrocket in the eyes of some fans now that he's been traded.
Vancouver fans were annoyed he wasn't even invited to the US WJC camp and the thread was chalk full of people telling us he's a dime-a-dozen small OFD that wouldn't improve the team. Now he's apparently going to be Adam Fox
Fox was drafted later than he should have been for a few reasons, but one of them was that he was a significant risk of going the free agency route because he was headed to Harvard. The Flames got him in the 3rd because they saw the value at that point in the draft despite the risk (surely they weren’t oblivious). Not like teams didn’t know what Fox’s upside was. Hunter however was committed to Michigan (not known for guys that graduate and go FA) and then changed his mind and went the OHL route. That “flight” risk didn’t exist.Two ~6' 185lb offensively inclined right shot defenseman drafted in the 3rd round who saw their production explode in their D+1 season aren't comparable players in any way?
I just don't see that being the case. They even had/have similar warts at this stage in their respective careers. I don't think you lead a major junior league by such a margin in assists as a dman without having your hockey IQ be an asset either.
Yeah I mean, there's very few players even in the NHL that don't have a flaw or two. I just don't think Brzustewicz is quite the boom/bust prospect this thread is characterizing him as. He doesn't need to be Adam Fox to be an impact player at the highest level. Good defenseman in this league can 1) avoid the forecheck, 2) move the puck effectively in every zone, 3) break up the cycle.
From what I've watched of him there's no fatal flaws that would make him unable to do those three things.
Fox was only 55th on the McKenzie polling scouts list. Probably should have gone 2nd round. Draft concerns would have been strength/physicality (no surprise). Hard to know to what extent it was just teams having a guy they liked more or early murmurs about his Rangers love.Fox was drafted later than he should have been for a few reasons, but one of them was that he was a significant risk of going the free agency route because he was headed to Harvard. The Flames got him in the 3rd because they saw the value at that point in the draft despite the risk (surely they weren’t oblivious). Not like teams didn’t know what Fox’s upside was. Hunter however was committed to Michigan (not known for guys that graduate and go FA) and then changed his mind and went the OHL route. That “flight” risk didn’t exist.
That’s fine. He’s probably our third ranked D prospect. I don’t think many Flames fans are expecting a perennial Norris candidate. He’s a good prospect that has some warts that need to be figured outI wish Brzustewicz the best in Calgary. But it's important to stress that he was far from the Canucks best d-man prospect.
That honor goes hands down to Tom Wilander, and the other Elias Pettersson (the Swedish d-man) who has already signed, was also clearly ahead of him. And the Canucks have already signed draft picks Sawyer Mynio from the Seattle Thunderbird and Kiril Kudryavtsev from the Soo Greyhounds.
I'm sure Calgary will sign him to an ELC at the end of his junior season, but at the time of the trade, he was still unsigned by the Canucks.
Yep. That placement on the McKenzie list undoubtedly was impacted by the perceived flight risk, which scouts and managers were live to. No team is scouted more than the USNTDP, he didn’t slip between the cracks. The Vesey (Harvard) drama literally was playing out in the spring of 2016 and at the draft (the Fox draft) his rights were traded. I follow drafts and prospects closely but not compared to the hardcores and even I knew about the perceived flight risk on Fox at that time.Fox was only 55th on the McKenzie polling scouts list. Probably should have gone 2nd round. Draft concerns would have been strength/physicality (no surprise). Hard to know to what extent it was just teams having a guy they liked more or early murmurs about his Rangers love.
But unquestionably, Fox made a much bigger impact at the NTDP than Hunter did, who was more buried behind Hutson and Casey, whereas Fox set a then NTDP record for points by a defenseman and culminated in being named best defenseman at the U18s.
They are very different. Poirier is a lot fancier and has had more notable defensive problems over the years. Brzustewicz has a better offensive game than defensive, yet the question with him is that he’s 6’0, not that fast of a skater, and not the most physical. He may only end up a 7D.I think of him as being like Jerome Poirier (only a rightly instead of a lefty). Very good offensive defenceman in junior with some warts. Maybe he'll work out and maybe he won't, but he's at least an intriguing prospect.
You clearly haven't been reading this thread. Flames fans have declared the reverse, and that his defensive game is like TanevThey are very different. Poirier is a lot fancier and has had more notable defensive problems over the years. Brzustewicz has a better offensive game than defensive, yet the question with him is that he’s 6’0, not that fast of a skater, and not the most physical. He may only end up a 7D.
I find this thread incredibly ironic after being humiliated for saying Adam Fox was a top 50 prospect in the ‘Top 50 Prospects’ thread.
The kid was the best prospect at the Penticton Young Stars tournament at 18. Anyone saying he wasn’t a top 5 prospect for the Nucks is embarrassing themselves. He will play. Likely a 4/5 guy who is a PP QB.
For the record, it was Jeff Marek who threw out Adam Fox’s name… not a Flames fan