GettingYourMoms
Registered User
- Jun 6, 2018
- 2,346
- 2,159
Saw game yesterday holy fing shiied he is so good.
Last edited:
If he makes the final WC roster in a top 6 role, then I'm guessing something around 12-15 games.Not hyperbole that he should've had some points out of that game. He was giving players fantastic looks. He looks like a more agile Power to me. Didn't realize he was so big. I wonder how many more games he can be seen in before the draft?
If he has more games like that playing with men then I don't see why he wouldn't be considered for first pick.
That's enough, if he stays healthy. I love getting to see prospects play against men. Exposes some, highlights others.If he makes the final WC roster in a top 6 role, then I'm guessing something around 12-15 games.
If he makes it.. he'd be in rare air. U20 forwards, sure. U20 D? That's a tough gig especially considering Czech D is generally weaker so he won't have a strong presence to carry him.That's enough, if he stays healthy. I love getting to see prospects play against men. Exposes some, highlights others.
IMO it’s a strength. Fast processor, makes good decisions quickly on offence, defence and in transition. Makes smart plays to buy time and space for himself and his teammates. I think his biggest hockey IQ weakness is he’s a bit too shot happy, prone to shooting from the point when there’s a better pass available. But it’s a minor issue, especially since he has a very good shot.I do like the tools. How's his IQ?
Honestly, i dont know. Depends if you want F or D.What exactly is this guys weakness?
Every game or highlight I’ve seen of him he screams elite defender
Why shouldn’t he go first?
For me it's mostly:What exactly is this guys weakness?
Every game or highlight I’ve seen of him he screams elite defender
Why shouldn’t he go first?
No one who drafts him is going to give him 3 years in the minors.For me it's mostly:
a) D-zone positioning/IQ, where Jiricek on some occasion chases guys around the ice, exposing a net front area for far too long. Sometimes he can seem 'lost' in the D-zone, not really knowing where to stand or which guy to cover. But he's improved this part of his game significantly over the course of the season.
b) Overagressivness, which is a trait of his that cuts both ways. You love his effort level and the intensity that he puts into pretty much every play, it's one of the things that makes him so fun to watch. At the same time, it sometimes leads to bad decisions in both zones, where he impatiently puts his mind to pull a risky move or deliver a big hit, even though there's clearly a better play available. But again, I feel like he's gotten much better at this, recently he has been showing much more patience and that he can slow the game down when it comes to it.
b) Minor skating technique issues - People often mention his choppy stride, sometimes awkward pivoting, and stability issues. As far as overall skating goes, he gets the job done fine as a 6'3"guy IMO. He's very shifty and unpredictable with his movement. But there's a room for improvement there for sure.
Potential-wise, there is no better defenseman in this draft class. Personally I'm hoping that whichever team drafts Jiricek will not rush him into the league. He needs 2-3 more years of development in Europe/AHL á la Seider and after that he'll be ready to do some real damage in the big league.
I wrote 2-3 years. And they should give him those years for their own good. Playing big minutes as an 18/19 years old NHL defensman is no joke, very few players can do it. And even fewer players can actually look good while doing it. Most young D's take time.No one who drafts him is going to give him 3 years in the minors.
Missed half a season... The tourney used to help establish this got cancelled. If he had finished the Jr's and played at Olympics it might be a different conversation. Instead we got 1 good period and adios!lol.What exactly is this guys weakness?
Every game or highlight I’ve seen of him he screams elite defender
Why shouldn’t he go first?
He’s like 5 inches taller than Fox and Fox is elite defensively. I think there might be some similarities with how their puck play, although that’s probably where they end.Adam Fox lite.
Was he pre draft? He developed that way and I think jiricek has the same tools.He’s like 5 inches taller than Fox and Fox is elite defensively. I think there might be some similarities with how their puck play, although that’s probably where they end.
The Carlson, Bouchard, Ristolainen comparisons are probably the most apt stylistically.
For me it's mostly:
a) D-zone positioning/IQ, where Jiricek on some occasion chases guys around the ice, exposing a net front area for far too long. Sometimes he can seem 'lost' in the D-zone, not really knowing where to stand or which guy to cover. But he's improved this part of his game significantly over the course of the season.
b) Overagressivness, which is a trait of his that cuts both ways. You love his effort level and the intensity that he puts into pretty much every play, it's one of the things that makes him so fun to watch. At the same time, it sometimes leads to bad decisions in both zones, where he impatiently puts his mind to pull a risky move or deliver a big hit, even though there's clearly a better play available. But again, I feel like he's gotten much better at this, recently he has been showing much more patience and that he can slow the game down when it comes to it.
b) Minor skating technique issues - People often mention his choppy stride, sometimes awkward pivoting, and stability issues. As far as overall skating goes, he gets the job done fine as a 6'3"guy IMO. He's very shifty and unpredictable with his movement. But there's a room for improvement there for sure.
Potential-wise, there is no better defenseman in this draft class. Personally I'm hoping that whichever team drafts Jiricek will not rush him into the league. He needs 2-3 more years of development in Europe/AHL á la Seider and after that he'll be ready to do some real damage in the big league.
Was he pre draft? He developed that way and I think jiricek has the same tools.
Carlson looks like a good comp to me. I don't like the other two.He’s like 5 inches taller than Fox and Fox is elite defensively. I think there might be some similarities with how their puck play, although that’s probably where they end.
The Carlson, Bouchard, Ristolainen comparisons are probably the most apt stylistically.
His IQ was so genius at the draft that was he taken 66th overall. It's called development and tools.Fox is a genius level IQ.
Legitimately one of the smartest D in the game. It's how he's so unbelievably good despite having below-average size and not being an elite skater.
Jiricek has nowhere near as much hockey sense. In fact, it's probably the biggest question mark with him.
I think he looks a lot like Power.He’s like 5 inches taller than Fox and Fox is elite defensively. I think there might be some similarities with how their puck play, although that’s probably where they end.
The Carlson, Bouchard, Ristolainen comparisons are probably the most apt stylistically.