Speculation: Rantanen to be traded or go UFA?

IWantSakicAsMyGM

Registered User
Oct 13, 2011
9,939
4,181
Colorado
Joe Sakic isn't going to pay more than 5 million dollars for a goalie. His modus operndi is all you need is average goaltending if your defense and system is good.

Grubauer had a 30-9-1 season with 7 shutouts and wanted 5.5 million to stay and Sakic let him walk. Traded for a cost controlled goalie on a bad team

Kuemper won the cup with them and went 37-12-4 with 5 shutouts and wanted just over 5 million a year to stay. Sakic let him walk. Traded for new York's Backup goalie and made him a starter and signed him to a cheap deal.

Georgiev is going to want a raise after a 40 win and 38 win season. He will be allowed to walk. And Sakic will sign or trade for a cheap backup to platoon with Annunen, while probably extending Annunen for 3 or 4 years as cheaply as he can if he performs this year.

There is no universe where I see Sakic trading for a goalie he needs to pay 12+ million for.

Except that isn't exactly true.

Sakic reportedly offered Grubauer $5.5m per year for 5 years, but Grubauer opted to sign a 6 year deal at the same cap hit with Seattle instead. This is what led the Avs to overpaying for Kuemper in the trade, as he was the only semi-capable guy with starter potential who was available.

Kuemper's season in Colorado was only his second career season playing more than 31 games. And he was trash in the playoffs, even before he got poked in the eye with a stick. And, he was already 32, which is right about when most goalies start to fall off (which he did). And he wanted a bigger money, long term contract. Sakic letting him walk was the only right choice in that situation, even before you look at the Avs cap situation.

And Georgiev should absolutely be allowed to walk. His wins are a function of playing behind that team much more than his play, and it seems pretty obvious that giving him a raise would be a serious mistake. And if Annunen doesn't step up this season, next season could see another short term deal for a backup with starter potential. Or maybe Nabokov gets a shot at it, assuming he comes over.

Whatever ends up happening, I'm pretty sure you're right that it won't involve a $12m goalie in Colorado.
 

VikingAv

Mediiic!!
Jun 18, 2006
3,962
1,670
Norway
I can't imagine any scenario where Colorado doesn't say "pick a number between 10-12, we'll talk term" and be done with it.
If Rantanen had agreed to a contract below 12 aav, it would have been signed by now. He might even get/hold out for a higher aav than Mack, because of starting his new contract later/higher cap.
 

Ledge And Dairy

Registered User
Joe Sakic isn't going to pay more than 5 million dollars for a goalie. His modus operndi is all you need is average goaltending if your defense and system is good.

Grubauer had a 30-9-1 season with 7 shutouts and wanted 5.5 million to stay and Sakic let him walk. Traded for a cost controlled goalie on a bad team

Kuemper won the cup with them and went 37-12-4 with 5 shutouts and wanted just over 5 million a year to stay. Sakic let him walk. Traded for new York's Backup goalie and made him a starter and signed him to a cheap deal.

Georgiev is going to want a raise after a 40 win and 38 win season. He will be allowed to walk. And Sakic will sign or trade for a cheap backup to platoon with Annunen, while probably extending Annunen for 3 or 4 years as cheaply as he can if he performs this year.

There is no universe where I see Sakic trading for a goalie he needs to pay 12+ million for.
This is very misleading. By nearly all accounts at the time Grub was expected to re-sign in Colorado after they used their goalie protection slot on him in the expansion draft despite being a pending UFA. Him signing in Seattle was definitely not part of the plan and that lead to the semi panic trade for a starting goaltender in Kuemper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LOFIN

Legion34

Registered User
Jan 24, 2006
18,902
8,856
Makes no sense for the Avs, we've all seen what Marner does in big games/the playoffs

It’s Mack’s team. Mack loves Mitch. Toronto had rantanen on their list if Mitch went to Arizona we were trading back to try to get him.

Of course both players are going to sign. And fit better on their own teams but it would be interesting if neither wanted to sign sith their clubs.

Heatly for hossa vibes
 

SEALBound

Fancy Gina Carano
Sponsor
Jun 13, 2010
42,302
20,997
I think it's too hard to determine what a trade might look like right now. Needs change throughout the season. Who knows where most teams will end up.

The only thing that would make sense to me is a swap with someone in similar value with a good value contract. Someone like Brady Tkachuk?
 

Cypher

Registered User
May 25, 2011
5,213
3,217
Edmonton
avalanche.nhl.com
I think it's too hard to determine what a trade might look like right now. Needs change throughout the season. Who knows where most teams will end up.

The only thing that would make sense to me is a swap with someone in similar value with a good value contract. Someone like Brady Tkachuk?

I was think something around Necas+ from Carolina. His contract talks didn't go well by the sounds of it before signing a 2 year deal. Carolina gets a star and can play with his finish buddy Aho. They'll have the capspace with Orlov and Burns coming off the books next summer. Avs get a speedy winger in Necas who has potential to do more.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad