Rumor: Rantanen Extension is Close???

TruePowerSlave

Registered User
Jun 27, 2015
7,566
9,170
Not necessarily, it would depend how they would choose to use his current $9.25M in cap space that he currently occupied.
They won't be getting anything that replaces a 100+ player

As much crap as Mikko gets here he is an elite talent regular season or playoffs. There is no UFA signing that will do better or an equal trade target either.

Best case scenario if he walks. They spend the money brilliantly to fix the roster holes and become a deeper team. That plan only works though if CMac really delivers and lets just say I don't have any faith there.
 
Last edited:

jfc64

Registered User
Jul 2, 2006
4,466
394
In other words, it doesn't work.

Also no chance that this is the goalie tandem they start the season with.

No chance is hard to say. A trade of Colton or Girard takes care of the problem. Also, Landeskog might not be back.

Why is Rantanen the first to go?
 

cinchronicity

Registered User
Jan 16, 2021
893
1,055
Durango
No chance is hard to say. A trade of Colton or Girard takes care of the problem. Also, Landeskog might not be back.

Why is Rantanen the first to go?
A trade of Colton or Girard may solve one problem. But that simply causes another problem. Who is going to play 3D? Kylington? DeHaan? Similarly, is this team going to win a cup with Parker Kelly at 3C? And where does the money come from to pay for a decent goalie?

The salary cap was specifically designed to prevent a team from loading up a line like 9296 - which costs $32M per year - if that team wants to win a cup.
 

jfc64

Registered User
Jul 2, 2006
4,466
394
A trade of Colton or Girard may solve one problem. But that simply causes another problem. Who is going to play 3D? Kylington? DeHaan? Similarly, is this team going to win a cup with Parker Kelly at 3C? And where does the money come from to pay for a decent goalie?

The salary cap was specifically designed to prevent a team from loading up a line like 9296 - which costs $32M per year - if that team wants to win a cup.

I have the feeling both Girard and Colton are "showcased" this season.

We are still only one (1) player from solving all the problems. Maybe Ritchie, Ivan X2 or Behrens (or Nabokov) is the one that push us over the top. Trading Colton might be better, though. In which case we "get" Landeskog or similar. And might be able to sign Georgiev for 2 million (he's still 0.9 in the playoffs) and maybe trade for Alnefelt or similar for depth. Imagine all of Annunen, Nabokov and Alnefelt next season. Three very talented "options".

For THIS season we are forced to use Landeskog only in the playoffs. In which case we keep both Girard and Colton. Question then is what we can get at the trade line for, say a secondrounder and a thirdrounder.

NEXT season: (when Landeskog and Wood gives their lines "character" (no Colton etc.)

Drouin - MacKinnon - Nichushkin
Lehkonen - Mittelstadt - Rantanen
Landeskog (or similar 7.0) - Ritchie - O'Connor
Wood - Ivan - Kovalenko
Kelly - Wagner
 

sethro109

🏒 🎮🏈🇺🇸🍻
Sponsor
May 3, 2011
29,067
33,829
Centennial, CO
I have the feeling both Girard and Colton are "showcased" this season.

We are still only one (1) player from solving all the problems. Maybe Ritchie, Ivan X2 or Behrens (or Nabokov) is the one that push us over the top. Trading Colton might be better, though. In which case we "get" Landeskog or similar. And might be able to sign Georgiev for 2 million (he's still 0.9 in the playoffs) and maybe trade for Alnefelt or similar for depth. Imagine all of Annunen, Nabokov and Alnefelt next season. Three very talented "options".

For THIS season we are forced to use Landeskog only in the playoffs. In which case we keep both Girard and Colton. Question then is what we can get at the trade line for, say a secondrounder and a thirdrounder.

NEXT season: (when Landeskog and Wood gives their lines "character" (no Colton etc.)

Drouin - MacKinnon - Nichushkin
Lehkonen - Mittelstadt - Rantanen
Landeskog (or similar 7.0) - Ritchie - O'Connor
Wood - Ivan - Kovalenko
Kelly - Wagner
Loosing any of our top 4 defencemen will cripple us. There's no way G, or Manson, are traded.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad