STL fan in MN
Registered User
- Aug 16, 2007
- 7,720
- 5,331
Rangers are going to let there overpaid Dman available for expansion. Rangers either way trade with the Blues knowing know that Shattenkirk isn't a rental which increases the value or Boston Arizona Devils Islanders
Have a chance to trade and extend him before he hits the market. Last time I checked Larsson got Hall?? Expecting the Blues to get Kreider or Miller plus for Shattenkirk who is more proven I don't see the why the uproar.
Shattenkirk will be traded and will be signed when traded or I believe he would have already been a Oilers this offseason.
If the Rangers chose to protect 4 d-men, which forwards might be left unprotected then? Just trying to see if that's a viable option or not.