It's literal dog sh1t. Deleted mine days ago. All hate on there. Stopped using it, and I feel much better.Like they aren’t doing it on Twitter already,( said with love. Its way more tolerable here when it comes to him)Twitter is impossible if you want any TDA hockey news. Twitter is 90% shit garbage.
This is the same thing though.Like they aren’t doing it on Twitter already,
DeAngelo is filthy during the shootoutShootout goal, I love his expression he looks like a caveman LMAO. He has so much swagger and confidence I remember just knowing he was going to score based on his body language before his attempt, he's scored something like 5 times in a row in the shootout
That’s what I’m talking about.
The idea that “if he gets better defensively, we have to pay him more and it’s too much money,” is flawed. If he gets better defensively, and is even average at defense, we have a perennial Norris candidate and 7x7 would be yet another steal.
I find the key to Twitter is not read the comments 90% of the time. ESPECIALLY if the topic of the tweet is DeAngelo.
Concern for him off-ice is his history and that he is very outspoken on social media. I do not have a problem with anything he says, but fear it is only a matter of time he says something bad enough that it crosses a line that the team feels they have no choice but to cut ties. When season ended, I said I didn't want him signed for more than 2 years. I was fine with him getting ~$5MM per, but did not want him locked up long-term. 1) They have a lot of young dmen in the system and 2 years gives them more time to evaluate those players. In 2 years, they may have a few options to replace DeAngelo at a much cheaper cap hit. 2) He strikes me as the type of player who needs short term deals to stay focused and motivated. He is not a guy I would want to have the comfort of a long-term deal. Obviously, that comes with a risk, too. If he puts up 70-80 points each of the next season, his price goes up.
Me. lol
How exactly would the Rangers even get Eichel? I don't believe ADA would be enough on his own, and wouldn't it be prudent to expect Buffalo to want a very big return for Eichel? Something including Kakko and one of Miller or Lundkvist? I don't think the Rangers even need Eichel more than they need solid center depth, no? I have a feeling that getting Eichel to the Rangers would wind up costing the Rangers more than Eichel could bring to the team.
I never said ADA would be enough. But a RHD 50-60 point D that is 25 years old is a damn good starting point. You can add in another roster play piece such as Chytil. A future 1st and possibly one Kravtsov. Not every prospect will make it. Not every prospect can make it. There are only 12 spots.
There’s just something about Twitter that brings out the worst in people.
Agree with everything here. This is also my fear and why I said I don’t like how he expresses himself (“how” being the key word, I’m not trying to start anything political). But I also think that it’s very unlikely that ever happens. Teams cutting ties with players for that kind of stuff (I think) is uncommon.
even when he speaks, it doesnt come out like it does for Aubrey Huff. He's opinionated, but its not at the expense of being disruptive.
It is not that I fear he is dumb. Just that in the heat of the moment even the smartest people can let their guard down and post something they shouldn't.
