If you’re talking as a sweetener, sure.
But as the main piece in a Peterka or Byram deal, absolutely not.
The Sabres management is under immense market pressure to make the playoffs next year. If they are trading important pieces, it will be for other important pieces. And ones with value beyond the short-term.
I think Kevyn Adams has telegraphed his mindset in his past 3 deals:
- Cozens for Norris
- Savoie for McLeod
- Mittelstadt for Byram
That’s where I think their focus is, and where this proposal is rooted.
Like most of the people who have replied, I think the OP favours the Rangers. But I was curious to see if others agreed, and how it could be improved.
Because player evaluation is always in the eye of the beholder and these pieces (Laf in particular), have a wide range of opinions.
Assuming these 4 are actually available, I think the bones of a deal are there.