gravey9
Registered User
- Dec 29, 2008
- 2,941
- 6,299
Yup he was listed as 6'1" when drafted, now Northeastern lists him at 6'2", and he looks like he may be a bit bigger than that.He looks to have grown quite a bit since the draft.
Any Kravtsov update? @Amazing Kreiderman
Nothing yet. Traktor playing tomorrow against Neftekhimik Nizhnekamsk
Thanks for the update. But is Traktor playing another team or did you accidentally type out your user password?
Thanks for the update. But is Traktor playing another team or did you accidentally type out your user password?
Tyler Wall deserves a call-up just for his helmet.
Tyler Wall deserves a call-up just for his helmet.
Tyler Wall deserves a call-up just for his helmet.
he is an underrated prospect in my opinion. i think he has NHL potential. and yes I still feel the same about Huska
This is why drafting goalies is fine (just not with top picks) when you have a starter already.
Georgiev will be replaced by Wall/Huska, the same way he replaced Pavelec, who replaced Raanta, who replaced Talbot, who replaced Biron etc etc.
Tyler Wall deserves a call-up just for his helmet.
Maybe by Wall--from what I've seen of Huska so far I doubt it. I think Garand might be good though.
Looking at the next draft Jesper Wallstedt looks very much like a top pick to me.
Huska is a bit like Georgiev, when he gets in a groove and really gets rolling, he's awesome. But then sometimes he comes out and basically from the start, he doesn't have it. I'm not really sure what happened last year; he started off well but then he just fell apart. Obviously the team around him was weakened by some recalls, removing Keane, having Rykov and Hajek both play poorly, etc., but he still just looked off the second half of the season. Hopefully he rebounds this year. I don't write goalies off until they get to the age of 25-27 or so, meaning Huska still has a few season so show something.Maybe by Wall--from what I've seen of Huska so far I doubt it. I think Garand might be good though.
Looking at the next draft Jesper Wallstedt looks very much like a top pick to me.
This is the dopest helmet I've ever seen.
Yes, but I don't care how good a goalie is. I would never use a 1st rounder on a goalie because in my opinion, goalie is the position that least impacts a team's success.
And yes, I know some people will jump at me for saying this. But let me explain:
An elite center compared to a good center has a bigger impact on the team's success than an elite goalie has compared to a good goalie.
Same goes, in my opinion, for defensemen.
If you have a team in front of a good goalie taking away quality shots, that good goalie can take you all the way to the Cup. It's no coincidence that the list of Cup winning goalies includes Cam Ward, Corey Crawford, Antti Niemi, Jordan Binnington, Matt Murray (both as a rookie).
Rinne, Lundqvist, Price and Luongo have 0
Does this mean you cannot with with an elite goalie? No. But in a salary capped league, you have to be careful how you spend the money.
Regarding drafting: You are more likely to find a good/elite goalie in the later rounds than you are to find a good elite forward or defenseman. Top picks should be used to find the players you are less likely to find later on. Price and Vasilevsky are great goalies and Askarov and Knight in recent years also warranted a 1st roud pick. I personally just don't think it's the best approach for a team.
Huska is a bit like Georgiev, when he gets in a groove and really gets rolling, he's awesome. But then sometimes he comes out and basically from the start, he doesn't have it. I'm not really sure what happened last year; he started off well but then he just fell apart. Obviously the team around him was weakened by some recalls, removing Keane, having Rykov and Hajek both play poorly, etc., but he still just looked off the second half of the season. Hopefully he rebounds this year. I don't write goalies off until they get to the age of 25-27 or so, meaning Huska still has a few season so show something.
Wall for sure has the chance to overtake Huska and may do so right off the bat.
Yeah Huska's numbers aren't pretty. Still, he's played 37 AHL games, which in a normal year would be only half of what you'd get in a time split. I look at it as the only guy in the past several years who has posted good numbers there over a meaningful amount of games has been Shesterkin. And they've had some decent guys--JF Berube, Tokarski, Mazanec, Georgiev--and they've all struggled to post even respectable numbers. It's hard to get a true feel on the ability level of these guys playing with such a weak team around them.Huska to me has struggled a bit too much at the AHL level. To be fair Georgiev's AHL numbers weren't exactly stellar either. Huska and Wall should battle it out this year but then again there's only 24 games so I'm not sure that one is going to really have enough opportunity to be the guy until maybe next season. Reunanen will be the D to watch this year and Schneider if he doesn't end up back in the WHL.
Yeah Huska's numbers aren't pretty. Still, he's played 37 AHL games, which in a normal year would be only half of what you'd get in a time split. I look at it as the only guy in the past several years who has posted good numbers there over a meaningful amount of games has been Shesterkin. And they've had some decent guys--JF Berube, Tokarski, Mazanec, Georgiev--and they've all struggled to post even respectable numbers. It's hard to get a true feel on the ability level of these guys playing with such a weak team around them.
Really hoping Wall lights up so we can move Georgiev to Carolina