Toggle sidebar

Rangers Prospect Ranking: (Winter 2019) - #11

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expecting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.

#11 Prospect

  • Total voters
    68
  • Poll closed .
The Crypto Guy

The Crypto Guy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
29,217
38,901
Ranger's Winter 2019 Prospect Ranking

1. Vitali Kravtsov (F) (2018 Draft - 1st round) (+2) (54%)
2. Filip Chytil (F) (2017 Draft - 1st round) (-1) (77%)
3. Igor Shestyorkin (G) (2014 Draft - 4th round) (-1) (76%)
4. Lias Andersson (F) (2017 Draft - 1st round) (E) (49%)
5. K'Andre Miller (D) (2018 Draft - 1st round) (+2) (76%)
6. Brett Howden (F) (2016 Draft - 1st round) (E) (80%)
7. Nils Lundqvist (D) (2018 Draft - 1st round) (+2) (46%)
8. Libor Hajek (D) (2016 Draft - 2nd round) (-3)
9. Alexander Georgiev (G) (Undrafted) (+2) (41%)
10. Joey Keane (D) (2018 Draft - 3rd round) (+14) (44%)



GettyImages-890245014.jpg



-----------------------
SUMMER LIST (All nominations can be found here)
Tell me who you want added.
Added: Gettinger​
Click to read more...
 
UnSandvich said:
Rykov, add Meskanen
Click to expand...
Mac n Gs said:
Rykov, Meskanen.
Click to expand...
Ditto.

Should be a landslide for Rykov here. Too bad he didn't make it the last round. It would've been our first top-10 prospects list with 4 Russians in it (hockey-wise Giorgiev affiliation with Russian National team makes him Russian, we are not talking ethnicity here).
 
Last edited:
Again, Rykov or Reunanen for me, but voting Rykov because it may matter in this round.

If Lettieri is still eligible, then add him. Otherwise, add Boo. And if neither of those guys are eligible, then add Meskanen.
 
1. Kravtsov/K’Andre (it’s a coin toss for me)
3. Shestyorkin
4. Lundkvist
5. Chytil
6. Howden
7. Rykov
8. Lindgren
9. Georgiev
10. Andersson
11. Keane
12. Hajek
13. Ragnarsson
14. Barron
15. Reunanen/Nieves

Change my mind.
 
Buchnevich89 said:
1. Kravtsov/K’Andre (it’s a coin toss for me)
3. Shestyorkin
4. Lundkvist
5. Chytil
6. Howden
7. Rykov
8. Lindgren
9. Georgiev
10. Andersson
11. Keane
12. Hajek
13. Ragnarsson
14. Barron
15. Reunanen/Nieves

Change my mind.
Click to expand...

Won't bother trying to change your mind on Lias because you'll just ignore it. Also Nils over Chytil, seriously. It's like you want me to laugh at you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rangers in 7, Rangers743, nyr2k2 and 4 others
darko said:
Won't bother trying to change your mind on Lias because you'll just ignore it. Also Nils over Chytil, seriously. It's like you want me to laugh at you.
Click to expand...
Ok, you can assume about me all you want, but that’s not an argument. What makes you think I won’t change my mind? I’m pretty open, and I won’t hesistate to admit when I’ve been wrong. But you actually have to make a point. “It’s like you want me to laugh at you.” Ok, buddy. Sure. If it’s so funny that I’m mistaken, then it shouldn’t be hard for you to write something of substance.

Lundkvist and Chytil were kind of a toss up to me. I see Chytil as a middle 6 forward (unless he improves his strength, poor puck handling, average hockey IQ, and poor balance). Also, I see Lundkvist as a top 4 defenseman. I admit I do rate him higher than most, but only because I can see him getting close to Brannstrom level. Is that really so unreasonable?

If you look at all that, it makes sense why I rate them the way I do. Maybe if you let me explain before making assumptions, you would at least see that I’m not pulling this out of my ass. I’m not saying you have to agree, but you haven’t made an argument. And Lias as well. I’m just not a fan, but I would love to be proven wrong. That’s the thing. Why would you assume I would ignore it? Just because I don’t go along with the groupthink? Come on, dude. Patronizing me may get you likes, but I would rather you attack me based on my argument.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Off Sides
Buchnevich89 said:
Ok, you can assume about me all you want, but that’s not an argument. What makes you think I won’t change my mind? I’m pretty open, and I won’t hesistate to admit when I’ve been wrong. But you actually have to make a point. “It’s like you want me to laugh at you.” Ok, buddy. Sure. If it’s so funny that I’m mistaken, then it shouldn’t be hard for you to write something of substance.

Lundkvist and Chytil were kind of a toss up to me. I see Chytil as a middle 6 forward (unless he improves his strength, poor puck handling, average hockey IQ, and poor balance). Also, I see Lundkvist as a top 4 defenseman. I admit I do rate him higher than most, but only because I can see him getting close to Brannstrom level. Is that really so unreasonable?

If you look at all that, it makes sense why I rate them the way I do. Maybe if you let me explain before making assumptions, you would at least see that I’m not pulling this out of my ass. I’m not saying you have to agree, but you haven’t made an argument. And Lias as well. I’m just not a fan, but I would love to be proven wrong. That’s the thing. Why would you assume I would ignore it? Just because I don’t go along with the groupthink? Come on, dude. Patronizing me may get you likes, but I would rather you attack me based on my argument.
Click to expand...

You’d do yourself a favor to delete your list and this post with your view of Chytil as middle 6 forward. There’s a of course a possibility of this eventuality but for now facts are that

1. The Rangers ALREADY have a teenage Chytil in their middle 6. 2. This evening a prospect of about the same age who was the the best forward prospect in 2018 draft and projected to be a sure top line forward was playing for our opponents and how did they look relative to one another? How many teenage prospects are in the NHL altogether now?
3. Two prospects polls came out and on both Chytil was prominently featured.

So how based on all of this can you put Chytil below Lundkvist and called him middle 6er?
 
  • Like
Reactions: darko
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom