Toggle sidebar

Rangers Prospect Poll (Summer 2023) - #16 Prospect

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates

#16

  • Total voters
    41
  • Poll closed .
The Crypto Guy

The Crypto Guy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2017
29,134
38,738
Rangers Summer 2023 Prospect Ranking

1. Gabe Perreault (F) (2023 Draft - 1st round) [ Not Ranked ]
2. Brennan Othmann (F) (2021 Draft - 1st round) [ 1st / 3rd / 4th / 8th ]
3. Will Cuylle (F) (2020 Draft - 2nd round) [ 3rd / 7th / 9th / 12th ]
4. Adam Sykora (F) (2022 Draft - 2nd round) [ 5th / 9th ]
5. Zac Jones (D) (2019 Draft - 3rd round) [ 2nd / 3rd / 6th / 7th / 17th ]
6. Dylan Garand (G) (2020 Draft - 4th round) [ 6th / 8th / 10th / 15th ]
7. Bryce McConnell-Barker (F) (2020 Draft - 4th round) [ 7th / 10th ]
8. Brett Berard (F) (2020 Draft - 5th round) [ 4th / 5th / 6th / 11th ]
9. Matthew Robertson (D) (2020 Draft - 4th round) [ 8th / 6th / 8th / 7th / 13th ]
10. Ty Emberson (D) (2018 Draft - 3rd round by ARZ) [ 14th / 16th ]
11. Adam Edström (F) (2019 Draft - 6th round) [ 16th / 15th / 20th / 22th ]
12. Jaroslav Chmelar (F) (2021 Draft - 5th round) [ 10th / 23th ]
13. Maxim Barbashev (F) (2022 Draft - 5th round) [ 11th / 18th ]
14. Drew Fortescue (D) (2023 Draft - 3rd round) [ Not Ranked ]
15. Bobby Trivigno (F) (Undrafted) [ 9th / 11th ]

Bobby-Trivingo.png




Added: Hugo Ollas (G)

Please tell me who you want added next

​
[TABLE=collapse]
[TR]
[TD]Player[/TD]
[TD]Pos.[/TD]
[TD]Sh.[/TD]
[TD]DOB[/TD]
[TD]Ht.[/TD]
[TD]Wt.[/TD]
[TD]Acquired[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Boyko, Talyn[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]10/16/02[/TD]
[TD]6'8"[/TD]
[TD]200[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R4 #112 2021[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Brouillard, Nikolas[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]02/07/95[/TD]
[TD]5'10"[/TD]
[TD]172[/TD]
[TD]Signed as UDFA 2023[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Henricks, Ty[/TD]
[TD]LW[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]06/28/05[/TD]
[TD]6'5"[/TD]
[TD]205[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R6 #183 2023[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Henriksson, Karl[/TD]
[TD]C/LW[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]02/05/01[/TD]
[TD]5'9"[/TD]
[TD]176[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R2 #58 2019[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Karpa, Zakary[/TD]
[TD]C[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]03/25/02[/TD]
[TD]6'2"[/TD]
[TD]190[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R6 #191 2022[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kempf, Hank[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]04/15/02[/TD]
[TD]6'2"[/TD]
[TD]200[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R7 #208 2021[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Kjellberg, Simon[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]02/17/00[/TD]
[TD]6'3"[/TD]
[TD]210[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R6 #163 2018[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Korczak, Ryder[/TD]
[TD]C[/TD]
[TD]R[/TD]
[TD]09/23/02[/TD]
[TD]5'11"[/TD]
[TD]173[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R3 #75 2021[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Lamb, Brody[/TD]
[TD]RW[/TD]
[TD]R[/TD]
[TD]08/30/03[/TD]
[TD]6'1"[/TD]
[TD]175[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R4 #104 2021[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Larsson, Rasmus[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]02/09/04[/TD]
[TD]6'3"[/TD]
[TD]198[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R5 #152 2023[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Lindbom, Olof[/TD]
[TD]G[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]07/23/00[/TD]
[TD]6'2"[/TD]
[TD]183[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R2 #39 2018[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Mancini, Victor[/TD]
[TD]D[/TD]
[TD]R[/TD]
[TD]05/26/02[/TD]
[TD]6'4"[/TD]
[TD]215[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R5 #159 2022[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Pajuniemi, Lauri[/TD]
[TD]RW[/TD]
[TD]R[/TD]
[TD]09/12/99[/TD]
[TD]6'0"[/TD]
[TD]196[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R5 #132 2018[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Roobroeck, Dylan[/TD]
[TD]C[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]07/27/04[/TD]
[TD]6'7"[/TD]
[TD]204[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R6 #178 2023[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]Tärnström, Oliver[/TD]
[TD]C/LW[/TD]
[TD]L[/TD]
[TD]08/30/02[/TD]
[TD]6'0"[/TD]
[TD]159[/TD]
[TD]Drafted R3 #92 2020[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Click to read more...
 
Am I reading this correctly? Brouillard's DOB is '95 making him 28 years old. He should be ineligible for prospect rankings, right?
 
n8 said:
Am I reading this correctly? Brouillard's DOB is '95 making him 28 years old. He should be ineligible for prospect rankings, right?
Click to expand...
www.eliteprospects.com

Nikolas Brouillard - Stats, Contract, Salary & More

Eliteprospects.com hockey player profile of Nikolas Brouillard, 1995-02-07 Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, CAN Canada. Most recently in the AHL with Coachella Valley Firebirds. Complete player biography and stats.
www.eliteprospects.com www.eliteprospects.com

true he is 28

finished QMJHL career in 16,
a year in minors,
3 years Canadain Uni at McGill
then resumed pro career in '20-21
 
Add Korczak. Had a strong CHL season. Should have a good idea what’s waiting for him in the AHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwede
n8 said:
Am I reading this correctly? Brouillard's DOB is '95 making him 28 years old. He should be ineligible for prospect rankings, right?
Click to expand...
I included him on the list that CG is using because to me, he is no different than a random undrafted European guy like Gustav Rydahl who signs a contract at 27. I think those guys should get a year. Brouillard is old and has played in the AHL for a few years but this was his first NHL contract, and he is also a unique story in terms of his career progression.

The HF rules for prospects always had a carve out to their criteria that allowed for other guys to be considered if circumstances warrant. For me, he gets one year.

I understand a lot of people may disagree with that, and wouldn't consider him a prospect. I also wouldn't anticipate anyone voting for him, LOL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cwede
nyr2k2 said:
I included him on the list that CG is using because to me, he is no different than a random undrafted European guy like Gustav Rydahl who signs a contract at 27. I think those guys should get a year. Brouillard is old and has played in the AHL for a few years but this was his first NHL contract, and he is also a unique story in terms of his career progression.

The HF rules for prospects always had a carve out to their criteria that allowed for other guys to be considered if circumstances warrant. For me, he gets one year.

I understand a lot of people may disagree with that, and wouldn't consider him a prospect. I also wouldn't anticipate anyone voting for him, LOL.
Click to expand...
ok, so long it was intentional - no complaints from me 🤷‍♂️
 
  • Like
Reactions: nyr2k2
nyr2k2 said:
I included him on the list that CG is using because to me, he is no different than a random undrafted European guy like Gustav Rydahl who signs a contract at 27. I think those guys should get a year. Brouillard is old and has played in the AHL for a few years but this was his first NHL contract, and he is also a unique story in terms of his career progression.

The HF rules for prospects always had a carve out to their criteria that allowed for other guys to be considered if circumstances warrant. For me, he gets one year.

I understand a lot of people may disagree with that, and wouldn't consider him a prospect. I also wouldn't anticipate anyone voting for him, LOL.
Click to expand...
Definitely think it’s fair to give him a couple polls.
 
Kinda been voting on and off here.. my list would be much different. And just to piggyback off the comments above... I feel it could've been a bit more interesting if we included some of our recent signings/acquisitions. They haven't really proven themselves at the NHL level and they're still young enough that I'd consider them prospects. Mac Hollowell is 24, Connor Mackey is 26, Leschyshyn is 24.

Honestly if we didn't go out and grab Gustafsson I think Mackey would've shared that 6 spot with Jones or whoever.. maybe he still does. He became an everyday player in Arizona. Based on the write-ups I've seen, he was expected to be in their top 6 for this season. I think the assumption has to be that the only reason he's not in Arizona is because he was a UFA and not because they didn't try to keep him. He really didn't play much of a role in Calgary. Something worth keeping in mind, this was also a team that felt they had no role for Välimäki, who promptly took on a top 4 role in Arizona and managed 34 points after being claimed off waivers. So I wouldn't say it's a death sentence that Mackey couldn't earn a role in Calgary but finally got games in Arizona. I don't think this is some sort of Strålman find or anything like that but he is someone that offers a bit of an alternative to play styles like Gustafsson and Jones. You have options for skill and finesse and options for size and physicality
 
Last edited:
B17 Apricots said:
... if we didn't go out and grab Gustafsson I think Mackey would've shared that 6 spot with Jones or whoever.. maybe he still does. He became an everyday player in Arizona. Based on the write-ups I've seen, he was expected to be in their top 6 for this season. ...
Click to expand...
yeah the Gustafsson signing concerns me precisely because of Mackey
If all other 7 likely D candidates are healthy, I expect Mackey will be the waiver guy,
(NOT including Harpur or Hollowell here, seems inevitable they will be waived, barring notable issues)

I will be hoping that he slips through waivers, as most guys do at that time of year,
as ALL teams are needed to pare down their rosters ..

as far as including the older roster candidates here, i think thats a different kind of conversation,
perhaps more apt for the Roster-Building topic than Prospects
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom