Proposal: Rangers and Maple Leafs
- Thread starter SFD22
- Start date
Insert each and every "NO" meme on the Internet here. Then post each of them a thousand times.
That's approximately 1% of my reaction.
That's approximately 1% of my reaction.
No Salary retained on either player and you have a deal, but holland needs to be signed before hand
Ropesman
Registered User
no thanks from the leafs, we will be happy to have Lupuls contract fall off after 2 years, don't need another bad contract for 2 more years after and give up Holland to do so.
I am aware DG is a better and has more value then Lupul just don't think he is a fit here.
I am aware DG is a better and has more value then Lupul just don't think he is a fit here.
lebdafor norris
sleepy
- Mar 14, 2011
- 3,828
- 889
I would rather bathe in athlete's foot for the entire duration of Girardi's contract than trade for him without retention.
EDIT: He has FOUR ****ING YEARS LEFT?!?!? That's almost Clarkson bad.
Last edited by a moderator:
Given the term left on Girardi it is a non starter. If he had 2 years left like Lupul..then mayne I would consider a straight up deal.
Otherwise...good luck to you.
Otherwise...good luck to you.
Are you kidding....not even close. Still wouldn't do it.
You realize that Bozak is actually a decent hockey player. As a 3rd line centre he is a great fit.
Igor Shestyorkin
#26, the sickest of 'em all.
A1LeafNation
Good, is simply not good enough!
- Oct 17, 2010
- 27,825
- 17,976
Canada4Gold
Registered User
- Dec 22, 2010
- 43,054
- 9,239
So we're taking on 2 extra years for what? To get rid of Holland? Who we could have not qualified if we didn't want him?
Ummm do I need to say pass? Or was this terrible proposal a rhetorical question?
Pyrophorus
Registered User
It makes absolutely no sense for the Rangers to trade Buchnevich just to get rid of a bad contract. They need to add youth, not subtract.
From Toronto's end, there's basically no sweetener sweet enough for me to take Girardi without max retention. We miraculously got out of the Clarkson horror and there's no reason to tempt fate again.
leaflover
Stanley Cup 2022
Both teams are probably stuck with their respective guys until the contracts expire and the sooner the better. If Toronto had a contract of equal term to move but cheaper it might work.
Girardi has negative value. Lupul also has negative value, but for less term.
Therefore, Lupuls value > Girardi's value.
Poignant Discussion*
I tell it like it is
Leafs have set themselves up nicely to clear most of their bad contracts next yaar. They'll be slearing the couple remaining -- like Lupul -- the year after. The chances of them adding a bad 4 year deal is about as likely as pigs flying.
Liferleafer
TSN Scrum Lurker
- Feb 9, 2011
- 39,848
- 13,005
