I will say this when it comes to Laba, Mancini, and Karpa--on guys that I know nothing about, I will generally defer to the scouts. Our current group of scouts, they have not yet done anything to make me believe they're incapable of identifying talent or that they're all about drafting ECHL-level fodder. I am willing to give them the benefit of the doubt that a) they see something in these kids to make them think they're worth a pick, and b) they're worth a pick in this spot.
Its a different story if I've seen a kid play or know a lot about him and have formed my own opinion. Guys I know nothing about? I won't pretend to have an opinion, or I won't try to pass off my opinion as based on anything I know personally.
In the last decade, since it has become easy to watch guys all over the world pre-draft, the two picks I was most critical of--that I knew nothing about first hand--were Kjellberg and Lindbom. And, Lindbom wasn't even about who he was as a prospect as much as where and when he was picked. Kjellberg, my opposition to him was legitimate, but also became kind of a joke that I ran with. Even then, Lindbom received an ELC and may still have some upside and Kjellberg has shown he's at least mildly interesting as a prospect, and not a complete throwaway.
My point being, while Laba is not necessarily the profile I would have chosen to draft, until these scouts show me they're incompetent, I'll at least give the kids a year or two from their draft before I declare them awful picks. Particularly in a draft like this, where outside of the consensus top-50 or so, it's really slim pickings.