You can't compare Modric with half of that list.. Different roles. I definitely think he is one of the best DCM/CM's in the world but 50% of that list is offensive minded players.
I'm likely as biased as you are but Eriksen is as good as anyone on that list and better than quite a few of them imo. The only player with better stats (on your list) last season was De Bruyne and he still created less chances than Eriksen...
Modric doesn't play DCM. He plays CM on the right side at Real and that's where he got the widespread recognition as
THE best midfielder of the last 5 years (coincided with Xavi leaving and Iniesta slow decline).
KDB plays as CM at City. Same as Modric and Kroos. And Iniesta and Thiago. And SMS.
Busquets and Matic play DM.
Silva plays CM/AM.
Eriksen plays AM. Only one from that list who plays more AM than CM (like Eriksen) is Coutinho.
I think Eriksen a wonderful player and I would take very few AMs over him (Isco for one, Coutinho), but I think saying he's as good as Modric and Kroos, for example, is a bit much.
Different positions, but no, I don't think Eriksen brings as much to his team as Modric or Kroos. Very few players do.
I know it's popular to dump on Kroos now with Germany out, but the guy won 4 CLs and a WC for a reason.
And again, other than Coutinho noone from that list spends nearly as much time at AM as Eriksen.
So comparing chances created, assists, goals, whatever... Doesn't really paint the whole picture.
Again, disclaimer, I think Eriksen is fantastic. But comparing him to people who are coming off 3 straight CL wins isn't gonna look great.