Quinton Byfield disgusting goal

Maybe 3 seconds, in real time, watch from the face off, they tie up, Wright brings up, Byfield pulls it away while gaining position, Wright does nothing, doesn't engage, doesn't try and make a play, you say you've never seen that happen without a penalty,

Show me a penalty like that where the guys stick is being held, isn't trying to engage or make a play, if that happens, more than likely that gets called, but Wright literally stands there like a wet fish,

Tell me, should cross checks be called in front of the net? All cross checks, or in the corners? It's essentially the same thing,

Better yet, what did Wright lose the ability to do?
Maybe read the rule and see that none of the questions you ask dancing around the question are in any way relevant to whether or not it was a penalty.
 
Shouldn’t that be a penalty seriously I don’t know holding the stick/interence
 
Maybe read the rule and see that none of the questions you ask dancing around the question are in any way relevant to whether or not it was a penalty.

Sure they are,

Why are people all of a sudden acting like rule book is black and white.

Holding the stick HAS NEVER BEEN APPLIED THAT WAY BEFORE... why are people expecting it wanting it now?
 
Sure they are,

Why are people all of a sudden acting like rule book is black and white.

Holding the stick HAS NEVER BEEN APPLIED THAT WAY BEFORE... why are people expecting it wanting it now?
So looking at the poll, 6% of votes agree with you, on no penalty. Good idea on the poll, mick.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad