goodgrimes
Registered User
- Apr 15, 2012
- 78
- 57
A hit on the numbers near the boards is dangerous, but it wasn't a hard shove. I can see it being a double minor to send a message, but this feels heavy-handed.
These past few weeks had seen some pretty bad hits so I’m guessing the league is having the usual over the top knee jerk reaction.Wow, i would have gave him 2. They threw the book at him.
No injuryI still think the hit was pretty tame, but if there was an injury 5 mins is pretty automatic.
Worthy of a two minute boarding, but since Norris was cut, it’s an automatic major I believe
If the puck is along the boards, players have no choice but to face the boards to retrieve said puck.Not necessarily a dive, I just get tired on players purposefully putting their backs to a defending player knowing 99% of the time they will draw a penalty. The onus should also be on the other player for leaving themselves in that position knowingly.
Someone is going to get seriously hurt because they leave themselves purposefully in a vulnerable position.
There's no such thing as a double minor for boarding.A hit on the numbers near the boards is dangerous, but it wasn't a hard shove. I can see it being a double minor to send a message, but this feels heavy-handed.
except you see all the time the nhl refs say blood on a boarding is a major penaltyRead the rule. They could (should have) reversed it to a minor after review, then the blood/game misconduct thing becomes irrelevant because it's no longer a major penalty.
The penalty should not have been held up as a major.
If that's the case, then to me the call was soft. I only saw the hit and not the aftermath.No injury
Sure they do. Norris was keeping his back to Hughes when he easily could’ve had his body parallel with the boards. We see players do this all the time because they know they can’t really be hit like that.If the puck is along the boards, players have no choice but to face the boards to retrieve said puck.
They showed Norris after and he had a pimple size spot on his face where he bled a bit. Now depending on how you interpret “injury” drawing a bit of blood could be said, I guessIf that's the case, then to me the call was soft. I only saw the hit and not the aftermath.
Not definitively, it’s a gray area in the NHL. We still see blood drawn from high sticks that only result in a single minor instead of the doubleBlood = injury
That's a very good point. I'm not sure why that distinction is there in the rules, to be honest.There's no such thing as a double minor for boarding.
Oh so that's a major, After review?? What a league.
A hit on the numbers near the boards is dangerous, but it wasn't a hard shove. I can see it being a double minor to send a message, but this feels heavy-handed.