SeanMoneyHands
Registered User
- Apr 18, 2019
- 15,217
- 14,526
Who was better in their first 5 seasons? Both won their first Norris in their first 5 seasons.
Leetch was better. There hasn't been a defense man in the NHL who has put up an as dominant Conn Smythe run as Leetch did in 1994. People on this forum also like to act as if Leetch was awful defensively, because he had great offensive numbers, and the narrative just doesn't hold up if you actually saw him play.
I think its close though. Hughes is great and is starting to carve out a fantastic career.
Ah, I didn't see that. If so, it's very close.The OP picked the first 5 seasons to avoid the 1994 Cup run.
To be fair, Leetch's 4th and 5th seasons were the best regular seasons of his career.The OP picked the first 5 seasons to avoid the 1994 Cup run.
To be fair, Leetch's 4th and 5th seasons were the best regular seasons of his career.
I'm just clarifying that Leetch doesn't need his Smythe season to be ahead in this poll. I'd take it as an honor to be compared to him as a US defender.Well I have a Leetch jersey that I wore to MSG on Saturday so I’m a bit biased.
So he sucked at defense?leetch was better. he's similar to makar, even in style.
It’s funny how many old timers would apparently be the best player in the league if they played todayLeetch ainec
Leetch playing in today's league with today's rules (soft as hell) and style (let the defense activate) and sticks (biggest knock on Leetch was that his finish wasn't up to par with the rest of his game) would have everyone calling him the "best D since Orr" instead of Makar
It’s funny how many old timers would apparently be the best player in the league if they played today
yep the improvements in the equipment and the wussification of the league both serve to artificially inflate the skill level today
there were good finesse players back then too it's just it wasn't all there was too hockey
So he sucked at defense?
I can honestly say I don't know anything about Leetch .