- Oct 13, 2018
- 4,856
- 5,981
Youre attributing to me certain arguments when im just sharing widely-held observations of how it works - whether you agree or not.
I think you can make an argument MVP should be player of the year simply based on the original definition being voided by outdated/obsolete language. "Ajudged" when was the last time you used that in a sentence without it being the reciting of this? Seeing a relic of a word like this makes one wonder how many teams were in the league at the outset of this definition.
Determining the most important player to a team among 6 teams that are all/mostly in the Eastern time zone seems to be a lot less problematic than determining the "most valuable" player to 32 teams. Several teams are in the west an many voters dont even watch these games. So why even pretend that the level of scrutiny can be the same when it comes to adhering to the original definition.
Practically speaking, its been closer to Player of the Year for a long time. And its probably for the best.
But even in adhering to that old language, it's highly subjective.
Believe it or not, I actually don't think it would be particularly back breaking to be educated on the subject, especially if I were being paid to be knowledgable about hockey.