Quinn Hughes 5 min major for hit on Josh Norris

Status
Not open for further replies.

ToDavid

Registered User
Dec 13, 2018
4,182
5,254
Injury to the head or face is only an automatic game misconduct if the penalty is deemed a major penalty.

Major vs minor is entirely in the discretion of the officials, however if they choose major *and* there’s an injury, then it must also get a game.

That said, whenever there’s an injury officials almost always pick major because that means they had to do less thinking and less game management.

No, the boarding rule has its own exception. Any injury to the face or head from boarding is an automatic game misconduct.
 

tarheelhockey

Offside Review Specialist
Feb 12, 2010
86,735
144,427
Bojangles Parking Lot
Strictly speaking this is a boarding call because it involves pushing an opponent in such a way that he has a dangerous collision with the boards; and the game misconduct is automatic because it was a major penalty resulting in injury to the face or head.

But I take issue with the major penalty itself. The major is written to allow the refs wide latitude for subjective judgment based on “degree of violence of the impact with the boards”. I don’t see how anybody could look at this and say it was an exceptionally violent hit.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,436
13,719
I think we all know that it depends which team you like/dislike, on how you comment on these things.
That will influence some yes.
But if you ask yourself, did they call them as the rule book states
The answer is yes.

I'm sure you're objective on the manner.

Knies skated head first into Whitecloud.
I still can’t figure out , why he never tried to protect himself. He had to be looking down, but it didn’t look like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1989

coolboarder

Registered User
Mar 4, 2010
1,465
329
Maryland
This opens up a paradox box with players going acting like if he is injured and come back like nothing happen in the near future with faking injury from this point on. This is something the league wants to avoid. Amend this rules or else this will make the league a laughingstock around the world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Frenchy

Bourne Endeavor

Registered User
Apr 6, 2009
38,986
7,932
Montreal, Quebec
This is the perfect example of how the league allows hits and shoves from behind, up until something happens because of a fluke and there's an injury.

It's nonsensical.

This is what's so frustrating. If they actually called all the hooking, shoving and general nonsense players get away with, especially in the playoffs, I'd still call this soft but begrudgingly say whatever. At least it's consistent.

Instead, it's all but bloody random when they decide "oh hey, NOW it's a penalty. Only for this one game though."

This opens up a paradox box with players going acting like if he is injured and come back like nothing happen in the near future with faking injury from this point on. This is something the league wants to avoid. Amend this rules or else this will make the league a laughingstock around the world.

Unironically, this is something Steve Dangle has said several times now as a point of emphasis for how inconsistent refs are. "Just pretend you're dead. Make them get out the stretcher and everything." The sad part is, he's entirely right.
 

KevinRedkey

12/18/23 and beyond!
Jan 22, 2010
10,538
5,827
2 minutes for Hughes and 2 minutes for Norris for the embellishment

Thats ridiculous. You honestly think he meant to shove his mouth on to the boards and potentially lose teeth? Cmon now...

Should have been 2mins for Hughes and that's it. Had Norris not fallen, it would have been a nothing play, but unfortunately (for Hughes), Norris did (fall).
 

Three On Zero

HF Designated Parking Instructor
Sponsor
Oct 9, 2012
32,821
31,761
Thats ridiculous. You honestly think he meant to shove his mouth on to the boards and potentially lose teeth? Cmon now...

Should have been 2mins for Hughes and that's it. Had Norris not fallen, it would have been a nothing play, but unfortunately (for Hughes), Norris did (fall).
Players need to be held responsible.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Senor Catface

canadianmagpie

Registered User
Jan 26, 2010
5,524
1,490
The funny thing is that Zub did the exact same thing to Blueger just a few minutes earlier. However, since Blueger was fine, it's a 2 minute penalty. For Hughes, because there's an "injury", it's five and a game? That's just encouraging players to milk the call to get the 5 and a game for the opponent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheUnusedCrayon

ziploc

Registered User
Aug 29, 2003
7,468
6,439
Vancouver
At least the refs made up for it when they threw the book at Stutzle for actually boarding Hoglander in a genuinely dangerous play later on...

Oh, whoops, no, they put the Canucks on the pk after that.

Oh, and Stutzle later scored.

Ah, carry on NHL.
 

Korpse

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Feb 5, 2010
20,984
9,880
No to make this even more stupid he left and came back almost immediately, possibly when they reviewed it and came to the same conclusion it was a major and misconduct or just after they reviewed it.

Breaking***

Player leaves game to get stitches and returned.
 
  • Love
Reactions: ziploc

Rydgar

Registered User
Jul 15, 2010
773
203
Surrey, BC
Honestly? It worked out for the best for the Canucks. They've been overplaying Hughes and this was a well needed rest for a game they won anyways.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad